My rightful rapid ELO is 1000

How is it funny coming from me

maybe look back.

"I should be X rating"

> not anywhere close to x rating

"I beat players of X rating"

> shows the one game they have of beating a higher rated player

lol

he dug his own grave. made this post because he was overconfident, and people called him out on it. he shouldn't have made the ridiculous claim in the first place. again, he dug his own grave, and now hes lying in it. it was his decision to make the post in the first place, so telling op that his claims your bogus and nonsense was a result of his creating the post, clearly acting pompous and brash. and he closed his account of his own free will. 
to end this rant off, i want to point out that i most of his losing games, he throws the queen into a capturing position and then resigns. this account in specific was most likely made to troll; the username, the posts, and the games they played can easiy help solidfy that claim. this is all speculative though.

didnt notice but he unclosed his account and has played 2 or 3 games

I played this guy he looked up to his name and cheated I don't think a 200 ELO can get 16 games over 90% accurracy

and other games he randomly has 50% accuracy he is a sarragant cheater he uses a bot because every move he did against me took exactly 1 second

except for the moves that wernet the best excellent or good

dont publicly accuse. report him privately

Why?

against chess.com policy

I played a bullet game from there and won!!!

https://www.chess.com/game/136847219328

I think he closed his account by inactivity yesterday because if you close your account yourself they aren't able to permanently close your account and the goal of that cheat strategy is to hope that when you unclose your account they either aren't paying attention for a bit and you reclose your account right the second after your reported or they forgot completely it gets cheaters to 1500 but then the accounts permanently closed again I knew he was cheating because on every game he reviewed himself it was 30% accurate through 60% accurate but every gamehe didn't review was like 90% accurate also every move took from 1 second to 4 seconds except for the moves that weren't excellent best or good it sometimes rated moves so it was kinda obvious but because he plays unrated they will never focus all attention to him so ya hell never get caught inless he starts gaining rating points 1 game was so short and every mistake he did was a big one so I got a draw even though he cheated so he cheated and didn't even win that's just cwazy.

again, public accusations aren't allowed

yeah, no public accusations of cheating, i will be forced to report this if it continues.

bro stop public accusing, not cool, and you're aware.

sh

why dont you be quiet penguinboy9

also id cook you at chess pehguinboy9