My School Just Banned Chess.com

Sort:
Pipking
Trfulton25 wrote:

My school just banned chess.com because kids were playing it to often in class. The kids are getting smarter on chess.com and learning more than they are at the school.

Chess.com was the reason I stopped focusing on school so much, chess was more important and valuable to me. These kids know best lol

Jalex13
I think language and literature are the most important subjects. They form the basis of understanding for all the rest, and for life.
“Be articulate. Because that’s the most dangerous thing you can do” - JP
EndgameEnthusiast2357

Writing yes, so you know how to persuade people in important subjects, but literature has got to be the biggest waste of time on the planet.

Be-nice-2-me
EndgameEnthusiast2357 skrev:
kezzerdrix wrote:
Play after school. The teachers are trying to do their jobs by teaching you stuff.

Chess is more useful than 97% of stuff taught in school. I'm saying this as a 23 year old college graduate. With the exception of math and science, school is mostly pointless. Trade school will earn you higher salaries than a college degree.

Different countries teach different things it's foolish to assume the rest of the world has the same education system as the US. (I have never heard something good about the US education system. Might just be lazy teenagers complaining but idk)

schchchch
My school also banned chess.com. Because almost everybody there is cheating.
EndgameEnthusiast2357
long_quach wrote:
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

but literature has got to be the biggest waste of time on the planet.

Literature is important.

Example: Romeo and Juliet

Learn why people kill each other. So you don't get caught in it.

It is inappropriate to read it to kids in school, the girl was 13, that makes the guy a (can't say here will get automuted). Extremely inappropriate content.

EndgameEnthusiast2357

Doesn't matter, it is inappropriate to expose s*x u a l content like that to high schoolers, especially when it would be illegal in real life.

x-2201733239

If your school got chess, why don't they use chess.com for educational purposes?

EndgameEnthusiast2357

Different times for people doing that stuff at younger ages in general, but Romeo was 17, right? That's creepy.

EndgameEnthusiast2357

Social studies in general is a pretty pointless subject to teach in high school unless it's actual practical stuff about the laws of other countries or how the US government/economy works. Who cares what civilizations existed in 3000 or 4000 BC? Boring..

EndgameEnthusiast2357
long_quach wrote:
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

Different times for people doing that stuff at younger ages in general, but Romeo was 17, right? That's creepy.

What is the life expectancy then compared to now?

You do the math.

If you can do the math.

That makes it even worse, Romeo was essentially a middleaged man and Juliet was a little kid. Eewww.

Wolfheart32
Trfulton25 wrote:

My school just banned chess.com because kids were playing it to often in class. The kids are getting smarter on chess.com and learning more than they are at the school.

thumbup

Wolfheart32

cry

EndgameEnthusiast2357

Regardless of how you twist it, there's a huge difference in brain development between 13 and 17+. People in that time period didn't just drop dead at 30 for no reason either. Stop trying to defend that kind of thing.

EndgameEnthusiast2357

So teach real world stuff, no one duels to the death anymore over that, so no point. Teach neuroscience.

EndgameEnthusiast2357

Understand and heal the brain, relieve pain, treat mental illness, reverse blindness/deafness/paralysis, enhance memory. Neuroscience is the most cutting edge field right now, and even more useful than these pointless moon missions they're wasting time on.

EndgameEnthusiast2357

I don't need some pointless ancient story to tell me that marriage and s * x are bad. Just look at modern society. That's what causes the most problems. Neuroscience would help prevent and cure the mental diseases that cause people to use those guns in the first place. Generation Z has this wisdom already, we don't need dumb fairy tales from the 1300s to state the obvious.

Ziryab
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:
long_quach wrote:
EndgameEnthusiast2357 wrote:

Different times for people doing that stuff at younger ages in general, but Romeo was 17, right? That's creepy.

What is the life expectancy then compared to now?

You do the math.

If you can do the math.

That makes it even worse, Romeo was essentially a middleaged man and Juliet was a little kid. Eewww.

If you learned some history, you would realize that was more common then.

EndgameEnthusiast2357

And that makes it justifiable?

EndgameEnthusiast2357

Literature with any romance topics whatsoever is inappropriate to teach to 14-15 year olds. All of this is just an excuse people who like em younger make to rationalize the weirdness. Topics like that corrupt the minds and souls of young people.

This forum topic has been locked