Nothing is perfect:)
No inaccuracies, no mistakes and no blunders
Sort:
Feb 19, 2014
0
#3
spawkle529 wrote:
Nothing is perfect:)
thx for your insightful contribution.
Im just saying nothing is perfect. Its a good opening
Feb 19, 2014
0
#5
FirebrandX wrote:
Now try a perfect game with at least 30 moves against an equally strong opponent.
I'd be happy with no mistakes and no blunders against stronger players ...cant expect completely accurate play over 30 + moves although i have played many good games - i will be sure to post a 30+ move perfect game when it happens. how about you firebrandx, lets see 1 or 2 of your brilliancies.
Feb 19, 2014
0
#6
FirebrandX wrote:
That game wasn't a brilliancy, just your opponent blundering horribly in the opening. I've got hundreds of playchess blitz games where I won like that in my auto-save database. For example:
I have to take you to task about your last post where you seem to have got the impression that i think the game i posted in was a brilliancy... nowhere have i made any such assertion - the game was a stroll because of my opponents blunders as you pointed out . However you advised to try some 30+move perfect games against stronger players and i merely suggested that you might post some examples of the 30+ move perfect game.
The main reason for posting my game was to point out that the computer even considered my first move c5 to be accurate when it normally says inaccurate,perhaps better is c6 and I wondered why this game where i played c5 is considered a book move and others times it isn't.-i should have made that point clearer .
Nice opening Trotters. Is that a 'named' opening? What kind of success have you had with it?
Just wondering; I'm getting somewhat bored with the basic opening I've been using and might try yours.
Feb 19, 2014
0
#8
waynet wrote:
Nice opening Trotters. Is that a 'named' opening? What kind of success have you had with it?
Just wondering; I'm getting somewhat bored with the basic opening I've been using and might try yours.
that opening is a sicilian closed and not open because white doesn't play d4 in response to my c5 but he made some bad blunders which doesn't usually happen ....checkout the various different openings on the learning features on this website.
Feb 20, 2014
0
#9
FirebrandX wrote:
trotters64 wrote:
The main reason for posting my game was to point out that the computer even considered my first move c5 to be accurate when it normally says inaccurate,perhaps better is c6 and I wondered why this game where i played c5 is considered a book move and others times it isn't.-i should have made that point clearer .
I hate to break this to you so harshly, but you ask any decent chess player to read the above excerpt and they are either going to roll their eyes or laugh in your face. The "computer" (of ANY type) cannot tell you anything about established opening theory, especially on whether or not the Sicilian or Caro-Kann is an "accurate move". That's almost troll level ignorance.
I am well aware of the absurdity of the computer advising after your first move that c5 is inaccurate but that is what the chess.com computer does when you ask it to analyse a game -I would have thought you would have come across this aspect of the site's computer analysis.
This quirk of chess.com's computer is really what this whole thread is focused on but I guess for some people comprehension of a subtle point is too much to expect!.... Ho hum.I hope for your sake that you show a bit more subtely on the chess board .
trotters64 wrote:
Ho hum.I hope for your sake that you show a bit more subtely on the chess board .
As a US champion, he must have some subtle moves, no?
Feb 20, 2014
0
#11
goldendog wrote:
trotters64 wrote:
Ho hum.I hope for your sake that you show a bit more subtely on the chess board .
As a US champion, he must have some subtle moves, no?
You would hope so but what he has shown in this thread is a level of defensiveness that is reminiscent of Bobby Fischer on one of his more neurotic days.
Checkout the game above where I played a perfect 9 move demolition according to the computer analysis at chess.com...unusually the computer even liked my first move c5 , it normally says inaccurate move, perhaps c6 is better.