well?
e

Bueller? Bueller?
Yeah that's how great your thread is. You hear that? That's the sound of the one cricket since the rest couldn't be bothered to give you a tune.

Who is best? Trolls or Noobs. I think noobs, since their noobness is very dangerous. Who owns chess.com's threads? Trolls or Noobs. There can only be one.
A noob is someone who is bad at chess. Their forum skills can be either bad or good, so we can assume that they're average.
A troll is someone with exceptional forum skills. Their chess skills can be either good or bad, so again they can be assumed to be average.
And therefore, trolls are better than noobs with regards to both chess and forum skills.

Who is best? Trolls or Noobs. I think noobs, since their noobness is very dangerous. Who owns chess.com's threads? Trolls or Noobs. There can only be one.
A noob is someone who is bad at chess. Their forum skills can be either bad or good, so we can assume that they're average.
A troll is someone with exceptional forum skills. Their chess skills can be either good or bad, so again they can be assumed to be average.
And therefore, trolls are better than noobs with regards to both chess and forum skills.
Yeah, but a lot of the noobs make dumb threads like h3. So the trolls need to exterminate them

Whatever happened to the term "Flamer"? When I played online games back in the day anyone who tried to tick off other players was called a flamer. When did it change to "troll"? Or is troll only used here on chess.com?

Who is best? Trolls or Noobs. I think noobs, since their noobness is very dangerous. Who owns chess.com's threads? Trolls or Noobs. There can only be one.
A noob is someone who is bad at chess. Their forum skills can be either bad or good, so we can assume that they're average.
A troll is someone with exceptional forum skills. Their chess skills can be either good or bad, so again they can be assumed to be average.
And therefore, trolls are better than noobs with regards to both chess and forum skills.
Yeah, but a lot of the noobs make dumb threads like h3. So the trolls need to exterminate them
Well... we could if we wanted, but why try to hurt them when they haven't done any harm to us?

Who is best? Trolls or Noobs. I think noobs, since their noobness is very dangerous. Who owns chess.com's threads? Trolls or Noobs. There can only be one.
A noob is someone who is bad at chess. Their forum skills can be either bad or good, so we can assume that they're average.
A troll is someone with exceptional forum skills. Their chess skills can be either good or bad, so again they can be assumed to be average.
And therefore, trolls are better than noobs with regards to both chess and forum skills.
YEAHH, TROLL = TALENT

Chess is too difficult for me, i'm more noob than troll
DONT WORRY, WE SUPPORT YOU

Who is best? Trolls or Noobs. I think noobs, since their noobness is very dangerous. Who owns chess.com's threads? Trolls or Noobs. There can only be one.
A noob is someone who is bad at chess. Their forum skills can be either bad or good, so we can assume that they're average.
A troll is someone with exceptional forum skills. Their chess skills can be either good or bad, so again they can be assumed to be average.
And therefore, trolls are better than noobs with regards to both chess and forum skills.
Yeah, but a lot of the noobs make dumb threads like h3. So the trolls need to exterminate them
AGREE AT 134,2 %, THEY ARE INVADING US. SOMEBODY HAVE TO TAKE THE CONTROL OF THIS CRITICAL SITUATION. . We should create an anti-noob group to exterminate every noob doing nooby things.

http://www.chess.com/groups/home/noob-exterminators there actually is a group
[COMMENT DELETED]