Forums

Obscure rule, or bug?

Sort:
adamplenty

Hi

This has had me curious for a while, and I've found no answers, so I thought I'd see if anyone here knows.

Windows Vista/7's Chess Titans seems to allow you to castle through check if the attacking piece is a pawn. I thought castling through check is illegal, full stop? I've searched and searched but nowhere can I find anything that says that pawns are an exception to that rule. My chess book (The Right Way To Play Chess by D.Brine Pritchard) doesn't mention it either. The other day I encountered a similar situation here on chess.com and it didn't let me do it. The only thing I've found is a Youtube video of bugs in Chess Titans, but lots of people on there thought En Passant was a bug! I believe this is illegal, but can anyone here confirm that's indeed the case and it's not some obscure rule I'm unaware of? Thanks

sftac

clearly a program glitch

sftac

Trapper4

It is illegal. Any castling over a check is illegal.

By the way, howd the pawn get all the way over there? ._.

breakerofwind

Why would anyone want to castle in that position anyway?  The pawn just takes the rook.

adamplenty

I figured as much. Typical bug-ridden stuff that they never bother to fix.

@Trapper4:

The e2 pawn you mean? I actually staged this, but only to demonstrate the situation (I don't usually play games agianst myself Laughing). I'm too lazy to play dozens of games against the computer until I encounter a position like the one I described Smile. I just played whatever moves popped into my head. As you can see in the first picture, there was a much better move. Not that it matters anyhow Smile.

 

@breakerofwind:

I know, but that's not the point of this thread. The point is it's illegal.

kco

whoever program the Titans should be given a new job (somewhere else)!

adamplenty

You think this is bad? Here's the video I was talking about:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOqaQlIZcGU

 

Thankfully, the other ones have never happened to me though.

ivandh

My solution: play chess against humans

kco

yeah that titans thing belong to the rubbish bin.

Metastable
adamplenty wrote:

You think this is bad? Here's the video I was talking about:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOqaQlIZcGU

 

Thankfully, the other ones have never happened to me though.

Wow! That will show the king who's boss!

AlCzervik

Humans have glitches too.

adamplenty

At least this glitch doesn't happen on the old Microsoft Chess program.

AKAL1

Generally, online sites with many players have less issues - leaving the issue unfixed enrages a large portion of the customers, and membership numbers will plummet.

adamplenty
AKAL1 wrote:

Generally, online sites with many players have less issues - leaving the issue unfixed enrages a large portion of the customers, and membership numbers will plummet.

This glitch is in a chess programme, not this site.

AKAL1

I'm aware - programs generally have more glitches. I rarely use them, with execeptions of CB and a particularly reliable, free, engine (Stockfish)

AKAL1

Well, it's the same logic as making Kd1 illegal - I capture you first!

ivandh

It is a long-established part of chess, dating to at least the early 1800's, that the pieces can shoot lasers and prevent the king from moving, even if the piece can't legally move.

blueemu
ivandh wrote:

It is a long-established part of chess, dating to at least the early 1800's, that the pieces can shoot lasers and prevent the king from moving, even if the piece can't legally move.

That rule dates back to the days when they used sharks with lasers on their heads instead of rooks.

Chris-de-Burger

Referee allows play on, as capturing the Queen or rook is good for black.

AKAL1

blueemu wrote:

ivandh wrote:

It is a long-established part of chess, dating to at least the early 1800's, that the pieces can shoot lasers and prevent the king from moving, even if the piece can't legally move.

That rule dates back to the days when they used sharks with lasers on their heads instead of rooks.

Back to the Future!