One of Magnus Carlsen's most tragic losses
Sort:
1 day ago
0
#3
Stupidity. Carlsen hasn't played such a game. Reported for trolling and misleading people
1 day ago
0
#4
Fet wrote:
Stupidity. Carlsen hasn't played such a game. Reported for trolling and misleading people
How do you know that? They were alive during the same time period, Carlsen was 10 when Bloodgood died.
1 day ago
0
#6
besides, can't you just read the "commentary" and figure out that it's a spoof?
oh. right. you're just trolling. by all means carry on.
oh. right. you're just trolling. by all means carry on.
1 day ago
0
#7
Cythaera wrote:
besides, can't you just read the "commentary" and figure out that it's a spoof?
oh. right. you're just trolling. by all means carry on.
oh. right. you're just trolling. by all means carry on.
I'm rated 400, i don't know what's spoof commentary. Can you explain what makes it nonsense?
1 day ago
0
#9
it shows how biological talent can defeat those who put in years and years of work. At the top level, chess is ultimately talent based, and Magnus, for all the effort he put, couldn't survive against Bloodgood, who possesses almost inhuman levels of intelligence, allowing him to reach super GM level in 3 years as a 40-year-old
What can you learn from this? there is no point in trying to be the best. Even if you are a super genius, there is always a chance that an otherworldly genius arrives to spoil your party. Plus, talent comes in different ways, like Einstein was worse than von Neumann at mental calculation but von Neumann would never have discovered relativity.