Opening, Middle, or End? Which is more important?

Sort:
Fenris_Venti

Clearly the opening is just getting the game started. Problem is, if you play a bad opening, your middle game will be bad.

Now say your opening is good. What if you completely flunk in the middle. Your end game is going to be terrible.

But if you have a good opening and middle game and are just terrible with the end game, guess who's going to get their pawn to the other side first?

The opening is important for a good middle game, and a good middle game is important for a good end game. If you're terrible at the end game, you will lose. But if you're really terrible at the opening, then your entire game is screwed. The middle relys on a good opening and the ending relys on a good middle. So therefore, the most important part of a chess game is The Opening.

Confused?

Excellent.

shell_knight

I want to learn a new language.

Please tell me which I should learn, nouns or verbs?

lessthan10

I have to disagree. Look at this game: 


Terrible opening, beautifully ended. Voila.

shell_knight
Fiveofswords wrote:
shell_knight wrote:

I want to learn a new language.

Please tell me which I should learn, nouns or verbs?

nouns. usually you can sortof imply the verb.

Thanks!

I want to speak it as well as those who study it seriously, and this shortcut should help a lot!

imirak

The middle game is definitely the most important.

shell_knight
tigerprowl5 wrote:

The opening for international chess.

The ending for xiangqi, Chinese chess.

The middle game for shogi, Japanese chess.

I wonder if the Shogi world champ is as good at tactics as Carlsen is at openings.