Openings for Trolls!

Sort:
DoctorStrange

King's Key opening!!



SaintGermain32105
[COMMENT DELETED]
DoctorStrange

Hippo-Troll counterattack!!!!!



Oofee1

THE UN_LARSON OPENING

The_4th_Stonewall

I favor black in the above position

Robert_New_Alekhine

The REAL Queen's Gambit:



BlunderLots
1NaturalDisaster wrote:

The Black hole opening!

 

The black whole sucks up anything within an 8 square radius, except the kings. Leaving them to make a piece treaty, or until one of them gets to close!!

Lol

Robert_New_Alekhine

1NaturalDisaster, please unblock me. 

Robert_New_Alekhine

Of course not...and by the way, a warning is usually enough for a first-time. Anyway, this is what is called accidental spam--I was talking about a position and make three instructive posts. 

Robert_New_Alekhine
1NaturalDisaster wrote:
winnyThePoo2 wrote:
Robert_New_Alekhine wrote:

1NaturalDisaster, please unblock me. 

he claims to be a troll and he blocked u? hahaa what a little girl


First of all, I can block anybody I want to. He spammed on one of my posts, and (i think) intentionally wrote incorrect analysis on one of my posts.

 

First, you have to learn what spam is. Spam is when somobedy writes redundant, unhelpful posts, several times in a row. Did I do that? An untrained monkey would quickly answer NO.

Secondly, you're going to block someone just because their analysis is incorrect? You must have blocked every player rated under 1300 on this site by now...not my fault that I did not study the position for long enough to give a correct analysis. 

You say you are a perfectionist. But does a perfectionist block someone just because their analysis was imperfect? No.

You claim to value good grammar and correct spelling. Brummagem, my dear friend! Let me quote: "(i think)". You probably still do not realize what you did wrong here.

And finally, your sense of humor seems to be rather obnoxious, and indeed, nonexistent.


Robert_New_Alekhine

Once again, you don't see humour if it dances in front of you. I'm saying that if you could, you would have blocked every single member of chess.com under 1300 for "incorrect analysis". There's also no need to resort to name-calling.

By the way, if you're calling what I wrote on your forum "spam" (three informative, instructive posts in a row--spam!?), then please consider what rubbish you posted on my forum. Zalgo, you called it. I can repost here if you want, just so others can see your beautiful artwork. 

Robert_New_Alekhine
[COMMENT DELETED]
Robert_New_Alekhine

etc2000chess did it once, was warned, and did not do it again. You could not resist the temptation even though you knew it was wrong. The fault lies on you, not etc2000chess, who stopped after the very first warning. 

Robert_New_Alekhine

A few times AFTER I told you to stop...

Robert_New_Alekhine

Because when you actually post something chess-related, it's actually interesting for me.

Again, why do you use bad language? 

Robert_New_Alekhine

It's a word that I find offensive, and that could be easily replaced by better language:

Why do you care so much about being unblocked? 

Robert_New_Alekhine

And notice how you suddenly strive off topic after post #52...

Robert_New_Alekhine

Notice that trolling is different than spamming. The type of trolling (for lack of a better word) that I do is used to troll trolls or to humour obviously ridicolous threads made by 9-year olds. 

Robert_New_Alekhine

Of course not. In any case, you could then report me. 

blitzcopter

ugh were any of these supposed to be funny?