Perpetual check anyone?
Opponent is losing, keeps putting me in CHECK
Sort:
perpetual check isn't rude or cheap. often it's the best available move for a player to make in their situation. are you honestly going to say you would want your opponent not to play their best legal move?
I used in one & was quite surprised by my opponents dislike of my *style * of play! 
Don't feed the (very obvious) trolls,
Jan 5, 2019
0
#26
btickler wrote:
Don't feed the (very obvious) trolls,
Not a troll. Just an idiot. See his game against piterak.
Jan 5, 2019
0
#27
ChessieJackson2020 wrote:
I'm clearly going to win, but my opponent keeps putting me in check over a pawn.
If you "clearly are winning" then set him mate and take the win. If you aren't able to do that then accept the draw or the loss.
fissionfowl wrote:
btickler wrote:
Don't feed the (very obvious) trolls,
Not a troll. Just an idiot. See his game against piterak.
Even running with your premise, this post is still not worth responding to. The username, creation date, and "come hither to teach the woefully uneducated" posting all reeks of bad trolling, though.
ChristianBC wrote:
@number-0. Comment faire nulle
Parfois, la partie d’échecs ne s’achève pas sur une victoire, mais sur une partie nulle. Il existe 5 manières d’arriver à une telle situation :
- Le jeu aboutit à une impasse quand l’un des deux joueurs ne peut effectuer de coup légal à son tour de jeu, bien que son roi ne soit pas en échec. C’est ce qu’on appelle le pat.
- Les joueurs peuvent se mettre d'accord pour faire nulle et arrêter de jouer.
- Il n’y a pas suffisamment de pièces sur l’échiquier pour forcer un mat (par exemple: un roi et un fou contre un roi).
- Le joueur peut demander la nulle lorsqu'une même position est répétée trois fois (mais pas nécessairement trois fois de suite).
- Cinquante coups ont été joués sans qu'un pion ait été déplacé ni qu'une capture de pièce ait eu lieu.
i dont know french
@number-0.
https://support.chess.com/customer/en/portal/articles/1444798-how-do-i-claim-a-draw-
For the above, I would suggest Google translate but it is not very good in specific domains
Tu put it simple:
-stalemate is when the player whose move it is does not have a legal move
-draw offer accepted (anytime)
-no mating materiel left on the board (e.g.: two king and one bishop)
-same position occurs 3 times (not necessarily in a row) and you request the draw on your move
-50 moves without a capture or pawn movement
ChristianBC wrote:
@number-0.
https://support.chess.com/customer/en/portal/articles/1444798-how-do-i-claim-a-draw-
For the above, I would suggest Google translate but it is not very good in specific domains
Tu put it simple:
-stalemate is when the player whose move it is does not have a legal move
-draw offer accepted (anytime)
-no mating materiel left on the board (e.g.: two king and one bishop)
-same position occurs 3 times (not necessarily in a row) and you request the draw on your move
-50 moves without a capture or pawn movement
lol i forgot that thing existed thanks
Jan 6, 2019
0
#32
It's a possibility to repeat, so... It's okay for him. But it's Clear it's a poor player to use this kind of tricks.
Nathalie_90 wrote:
how is it a poor player? should they play a worse move?
It's a possibility to repeat, so... It's okay for him. But it's Clear it's a poor player to use this kind of tricks.
Nathalie_90 wrote:
but in the given situation, a player should not choose a move that leads to a loss when they have a move that leads to a draw.
No but the game has to be interesting and aesthetic
ChessieJackson2010: And you are very lucky! Sometimes, we have lots of pieces and the other guy has King, Queen, Knight and a few pawns. More, he offers the Queen and wins with a lonely Knight and a few pawns. He doesn't respect our material advantage!
If you are loosing your only hope is a tie,right?
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
Either a tie or a belt.
a black belt, if the tie is kwon do.
Jan 6, 2019
0
#39
Heather_Stephens wrote:
If it has happened 3 times or more - in the same position - press 'Offer a draw' and it will declare a draw by repetition.
This! But also not it is the same position reached 3 times with the same person having the move each time and with no changes in the ability to castle or capture by en passant.
I had likely situation once. Drawish endgame with only 4 pieces on the board: K+Q vs K+Q without pawns. My opponent made carousel of checks around my King with intention flag me on time. He lost connection and lost the game. Chess Karma is a b*tch