Petition to Undo changes

Sort:
x-9083502342

for the rapid only people who played a 10 min game in the last 90 days

 

sndeww
1e31-O wrote:
happypi314 wrote:
Marraquetadeliciosa wrote:

Man, my main goal was to get to 2000 on rapid (but playing 15+10, 30+0 and 45+45, very different than 10+0. My blitz rating is 98% from 3+0). And now, with this inflation thing I am almost there but it feels like cheating. And there are a lot of player who only plays rapid so now Im going to get paired with really strong players in 15+10 pool and im going to get crushed several times. I don't like this :/

hmmm but didnt everyone get an inflate?

not everyone

everyone... who played 10mins. so anyone who plays 10mins will still be playing people who play 10mins.

sndeww

yes. exactly... 3min pool is diff from 5min pool, which is diff from 10min pool, which is diff from 15|10 pool.

NobleElevator

yes

sndeww

Nothing changes except 10min is now classified as rapid.

sndeww
horselover123 wrote:
SNUDOO wrote:

Nothing changes except 10min is now classified as rapid.

and that people are upset

yes 

Richard_Hunter

It's going to take some getting used to but I'm fine with it. It does mean that I'm not sure what my  personal ratings goal of 1600 actually means now. Now that I've just achieved it (lol) is it still the 1600 I knew before?

stassneyking

The world champion is decided in classical because this is the best demonstration of how capable the players are of playing their best games. Faster time controls lead to lower quality games. What really matters is who is capable of playing the highest quality chess.

If results were determined by faster time controls, Caruana probably wouldn't even be top 100 and what a shame that would be. We would never even get to experience his brilliancy at full potential. Why compromise our game and make it lower quality? All I really care about is playing the best moves, and classical allows us to play our highest quality game. 

sndeww

At the expense of extremely long durations.

stassneyking

Yeah, because when we spend more time we play better

stassneyking

Yeah blitz and bullet are cool, and I'm not saying one time control is "better" than another. However, if you are trying to determine who in the world is capable of playing the highest quality chess, it would have to be decided in classical because the players have the opportunity to play to their full potential. On that note, having rapid (real rapid) as a tiebreak I think is fair.

stassneyking

Yes that would be impressive, but the GM with 6 hours is going to win like 90% of the time, sorry to break it to you.

stassneyking

Chess is an art - Alekhine 

stassneyking

Whoever it is doesn't want to argue with me. I tend to silence these forums.

sndeww

you guys can also challenge me as well, I'd like a higher rapid with a lower glicko happy.png

sndeww

ok once I get my glicko lower by pulping komodo5

NobleElevator
saeadborji wrote:
SNUDOO wrote:

you guys can also challenge me as well, I'd like a higher rapid with a lower glicko

Idea is mine  you give me percentage later 

 

how about 10%? Deal? xD jk

sndeww

the commission

meibanfa93
I agree
NobleElevator
saeadborji wrote:

25% is the best I can do

how about 15, I'm taking a biiiiiig leap on that