I said that you, along with MDL4, agreed with VyboR that 17.Qxe4 was a bad move, which it isn't true at all and is simply ridiculous.
It's winning, but isn't moving a rook to the d-file better?
Exactly. But not as good as mate in one. Anyway, what the hell has all this to do with the main topic? You Game_of_Pawns took a random game and you proved what?
Exactly. But not as good as mate in one. Anyway, what the hell has all this to do with the main topic? You Game_of_Pawns took a random game and you proved what?
Are you retarded? There was no mate in one on move 17. There was nothing wrong with what Karel said and I never brought up any game.
What is sandbagging?
Intentionally keeping your rating artificially low.
Exactly. But not as good as mate in one. Anyway, what the hell has all this to do with the main topic? You Game_of_Pawns took a random game and you proved what?
The main topic is basically "my rating is 943, but I want everybody to know that I am better than this"
I could give you a heartfelt "hugs & kisses", but I'm not sure what you are expecting
What is sandbagging?
Intentionally keeping your rating artificially low.
You also missed that guy's user name ;)
My bad again. :|
How much will you charge me to screen my posts?
Exactly. But not as good as mate in one. Anyway, what the hell has all this to do with the main topic? You Game_of_Pawns took a random game and you proved what?
Are you retarded? There was no mate in one on move 17. There was nothing wrong with what Karel said and I never brought up any game.
I will no longer post here and possibly I'll delete this account as well. I want nothing to do with a site where such insane trolls are allowed to post.
Lol :)
Nobody, Nobody cares
Who cares that you don't care? Stay those useless, time wasting human beings that you are
Better practise chess, this is a chess site and im 100000000 times better than you. Seems like u wasted to much time.
ROTFLMAO. You might be a better chess player, but a better human being? That remains to be seen
ha, obviously high chess level does not save one from infinite stupidity
Underrated? Or maybe you're simply bad no offense. Even by USCF standards 900 is quite low. There are 1200 and 1500 guys at chess clubs I play against and beat. Keep in mind that's USCF so the 1200 guy would be rated 1350-1400 or maybe even higher since blitz is his strong point on here.
Your opening out of the gate wasn't that great, and in fact could even be losing:
Yes im stupid but at least master in chess. So what? Forrest Gump was stupid too.
What exactly makes you think you've "mastered" chess?
Nobody, Nobody cares
You obviously care. Otherwise, you wouldn't be commenting here.
Underrated? Or maybe you're simply bad no offense. Even by USCF standards 900 is quite low. There are 1200 and 1500 guys at chess clubs I play against and beat. Keep in mind that's USCF so the 1200 guy would be rated 1350-1400 or maybe even higher since blitz is his strong point on here.
Your opening out of the gate wasn't that great, and in fact could even be losing:
Somebody took a game out of the several hundreds I have played at chess.com and made a big fuss out of it. One of the two games where I blundered really badly.
In your last game, how many moves did it take you to lose a piece?
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1264812923
The one before that you lost your queen:
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1264718594
My Fide rating Patzer. Once you have a rating above 2300 or already 2200 i think people call u master. I dont care about that cause i dont have a title but its true...
Sagg_Bander, you're deluding yourself. That isn't an FIDE rating. It's only a rating on chess.com.
And I'm saying from experience they can't. What's your frame of reference for the claim? People who are 1200 FIDE or USCF are typically the best players in their non-chess social circles whereas 900 rated players are your normal people who don't even study the game. People who are 1200 have reasonable opening preparation whereas players under 1000 have trouble there.
Learn opening principles and tactics. Tactics will help develop your visualization and board vision and not to release the tension to the opponent's advantage (such as 6.Nxd5?) Work on your thinking system and integrate your knowledge to it with deliberate practice.
It's winning, but isn't moving a rook to the d-file better?
This is pretty embarrassing, but I missed that. Part of me says that I should now take back what I said but the reality is, the move still isn't that terrible for the same reason that caused me to miss the better one; it is completely and very easily winning.
I regularly miss things like this, but I will always go on to win. I see a move that leaves an easy to play position with a completely winning advantage and I just play it. This is not in any way the same as being overconfident and blundering. The common saying that tells you to look for a better move when you see a good one is idiotic. That is how you lose on time.
Thank you for pointing that out. I can't believe I missed it, but I know why I missed it, and I know that 17.Qxe4 is ten times the move that the uncriticized 15.Bg5 is.