No because if I am winning the first game and my opponent becomes belligerent and stalls, I don't want to be forced into a rematch.
Playing chess
Sort:
P.S. I forgot to mention that for all the players loses because time out, lets not forget, some time the computer may crash for any reasons, or he / she may get sick, and loose a game due to computer problems or sickness I think any body deservea second chance don't you think? for those hum are against this idea think this it can happen.
King5678
Both players have to agree to a rematch and it should stay that way. Nobody should be forced into 3 games. Most people don't even have time for 3 (if they're long) games.
Elubas wrote:
Both players have to agree to a rematch and it should stay that way. Nobody should be forced into 3 games. Most people don't even have time for 3 (if they're long) games.
I think that is natural( I didn't think it was necessary to be specific about for both players have to agree to a rematch) and it should stay that way, I believe we are all free it's up to both to agree, and if I may add, I don't think the re mach need to be playedone after the other, just for both to be in accord, when and to be specific 2 or 3 games,( it normal I think if a player wins 2 games the 3rd is not necessary unless some accord is reached before start,)I also believe that would make some kind of friendship via e-mail. ( brotherhood ) I believe is in the our National anthem and don't forget it's only a play not a meter of life and death, as I see from some comments it appears to be.
In short what I'm saying is Play and let Play in the name of Humanity. Time a go I lost many games with friend and they lost some also, but we are still friends on Line and in person.
King5678
slack wrote:
No because if I am winning the first game and my opponent becomes belligerent and stalls, I don't want to be forced into a rematch.
Naturally it must be in accord for both not to cheat, I don't understand "belligerent" If hi stalls as you saying, if hi stalls with the time I believe there is a time limit and he loose, is not the roles on Chess.com? any hu it's up to both to be specific on the role, I don't understand how can some one be belligerent with on line chess, Do you mean verbal ? and In may opinion if people do that they don't belong to the chess game community, I'm a simple man I work and I play chess to enjoy other people company hopping they enjoying my company while we are playing.
King5678
Well all that talk is good helps to know other people opinion, now I wold like to know if all those are in favor of this, I like to see how many is in favor and take it from there and start.
P.S I'm not sure how to start I guess the next game I'll start I think It's need to write a message before start.
King5678
I some time wonder if players would like that when you challenge or accept a challenge to make a rule that 3 games that way it will give the opportunity to the player that loses to have a second chance. (I would called the 3 game rule )
with the opinion for the 3rd game to play or not.
What you think about this
King5678