playing out games

Sort:
Avatar of brooklynrockstar
Seems I'm in a rut. Almost every game I play ends in a resignation as soon as I capture opponents queen. I'm in the mid 500s - seems like players don't want to try and play through when down in points. When I'm on the defending end, I play until I can see a true mate in a few moves. But quitting when down just he queen seems counter intuitive when trying to Learn/practice.
Avatar of Brontide88

A Queen or Rook down is an insurmountable material deficit unless there is immediate compensation (like a mating attack). If you want to learn how to cash in when you're up, play on. But the time spent in the lost cause might be better spent in a new game.

Avatar of wanmokewan

People at your level shouldn't resign, but it's their choice.

Avatar of BlargDragon

At the very least, there's a whole economy behind value per unit time in learning chess by playing in a losing situation that's more complicated than either a blanket "play on" or "resign" really solves. The right choice not only depends on the game and the players' skills, but what they want to get out of playing.

Avatar of Guest0547352743
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.