Please read. Serious for ethics, principle in good chess. Detail Alisa Melekhine

Sort:
elig5428

Enter, to fellows and players of all types and sizes. I posted this very continuous response to FM Alisa Melelkhina on her new blog the other day, @ http://www.chess.com/video/player/us-womens-championship-part-4-endgame-odysseys

that which you can now see was deleted. I am very seriously unsure and I feel it is an ethics issue of Alisa Melekhina seeming to represent to delete my comment, in which I worked for hours to procure a development on her points and delivered in a friendly and composite way.  I also feel it is an ethics issue and that ethics (with internet ettiquette as a sub-topic) is a principle in "good" chess, just like pawn move. Please read and reat and rate this considerate statement. I am confused and hurt by Alisa's move, I am not sure it, is she Russian? Does it matter? Well, yes, because whatever country she is repping, she is also representing the people there and the chess players (not just the ones she croons with online and sort). Please read this statement, and try, to all GM's and otherwise of course (a haha), to not indiscriminate indicate dislike or perverse abhorrance for your students on chess.com, by erasing friendly comments, and then providing terse responses when questioned, like I feel Alisa will do if I write to her.  Est, this is a public forum matter. Think.

 

Lige

elig5428

And oh, Alisa, this will be fun to read and deliver a terse legal description and analysis, like on your U.S. Chess Federation letter in March of this year, like one more step on the ladder to what. You should real consider not offending and students in the game, and be considerate of web site ethics rules quoted often and cited frequent with violations by staff. So, is it a plea of guilty, or innocent with condition and excuse. Bait.

website link to chess fed. @ http://www.uschess.org/content/view/12585/757/

Trag55

 Perhaps the extremely poor standard of English you employ is incomprehensible to her and becomes merely an irritant. By deleteing nonsensical comments she makes clear that your input is unwelcome without resorting to rudeness.

mrhjornevik

well I cant read you comment, since its deleted, but I have some other questions for you.

1 you refer to her as "this new FM?er" and a "fake girl newby FM'ers." is there any reason I should show you any respect, when you have absolutly no respect for others?

2. You state that you have written a "good descriptive blog post on updating a chess lesson" Is it your 1081 chess.com rating that makes you compitent to decide how good your own post are? or should we trust a FM to decide these things?

3 at which point did you think to use the words "indiscriminate indicate dislike or perverse abhorrance for your students on chess.com" was a good idea?

elig5428
mrhjornevik wrote:

well I cant read you comment, since its deleted, but I have some other questions for you.

1 you refer to her as "this new FM?er" and a "fake girl newby FM'ers." is there any reason I should show you any respect, when you have absolutly no respect for others?

2. You state that you have written a "good descriptive blog post on updating a chess lesson" Is it your 1081 chess.com rating that makes you compitent to decide how good your own post are? or should we trust a FM to decide these things?

3 at which point did you think to use the words "indiscriminate indicate dislike or perverse abhorrance for your students on chess.com" was a good idea?

I can take a corrective and thanks, but I think the point I was making was that my comment was erased inappropriately, a point which you did not defeat, even if my language was a little ambiguous and out there.

wanmokewan

Sorry to say this, but it -IS- her blog and she can do with it as she pleases.  I know you're upset because she deleted it without a second thought, but, to me at least, it's not that big of a deal.

EricFleet
elig5428 wrote:
mrhjornevik wrote:

well I cant read you comment, since its deleted, but I have some other questions for you.

1 you refer to her as "this new FM?er" and a "fake girl newby FM'ers." is there any reason I should show you any respect, when you have absolutly no respect for others?

2. You state that you have written a "good descriptive blog post on updating a chess lesson" Is it your 1081 chess.com rating that makes you compitent to decide how good your own post are? or should we trust a FM to decide these things?

3 at which point did you think to use the words "indiscriminate indicate dislike or perverse abhorrance for your students on chess.com" was a good idea?

I can take a corrective and thanks, but I think the point I was making was that my comment was erased inappropriately, a point which you did not defeat, even if my language was a little ambiguous and out there.

Do we have any translators who can tell me what this says in English?