Regarding your second point... the rule of stalemate is that the player with the move has no legal move. The opponent's possible moves are not considered.
But I think you are asking about a position such as this:
Regarding your second point... the rule of stalemate is that the player with the move has no legal move. The opponent's possible moves are not considered.
But I think you are asking about a position such as this:
It is possible, but probably extremely rare, to have a double stalemate.
The fastest known game ending in a double stalemate position was discovered by Enzo Minerva and published in the Italian newspaper l'Unità on 14 August 2007: 1.c4 d5 2.Qb3 Bh3 3.gxh3 f5 4.Qxb7 Kf7 5.Qxa7 Kg6 6.f3 c5 7.Qxe7 Rxa2 8.Kf2 Rxb2 9.Qxg7+ Kh5 10.Qxg8 Rxb1 11.Rxb1 Kh4 12.Qxh8 h5 13.Qh6 Bxh6 14.Rxb8 Be3+ 15.dxe3 Qxb8 16.Kg2 Qf4 17.exf4 d4 18.Be3 dxe3.[20]
Sometimes you hear commentary about a match in any other sport, where really nothing much is going on, they say "It's a stalemate situation".
Do these people actually know what stalemate is? Stalemate ENDS the game. After 20 minutes in a soccer match, what's the use of talking about Stalemate? And, on a more chess-oriented note: would it be possible to construct a position where both sides are in stalemate?