My puzzle rating is 2100+ but blitz rating is only 900.
I don't think puzzle rating is an accurate indication of how a person does. puzzle rating determines how well you win a piece or checkmate, but it doesn't prevent you from dropping pieces or misplaying a position.
I just hit 2938 puzzle rating. How come I can't beat Magnus Carlsen? Why aren't I ranked #1 in the world? /s
I think you just need to play more? I reckon you should be at least a 1000 rapid player.
I just hit 2938 puzzle rating. How come I can't beat Magnus Carlsen? Why aren't I ranked #1 in the world? /s
Because you are Deranged.
It’s funny and different for many players. In my case, tactics and middle game planning are my weaknesses, therefore the rated puzzles help my game.
I am solid and in most cases equal out of the opening but middle game strategy and critical moves are areas I am working on now.
Have fun and keep improving in any areas of chess where you can. Best of luck.
my blitz rating is around 800 and my rapid is almost 1300, yet my puzzles is 2200, so its fine/
Blitz 450. Puzzles 1700.
Blitz 450. Puzzles 1700.
Blitz 550. Puzzles 2050.
Puzzle ratings look to be effectively unbounded. I think the top rating is something over 65 000.
Username vskopalik rating 65535 at 1225GMT 11/1/2021.
I'm pretty sure that's at least 500 pts higher than their rapid rating.
It's interesting that 65535 is the largest integer that can be stored in a 16-bit number. If you "add" 1 more to it, it'll overflow and yield (the negative) -65536. So I'll bet 65535 is really the maximum possible rating.
This is mine as of today.
From your puzzle stats. it looked like you often spend over a minute looking for the solution to a tactic that you know is in the position. Would you spend this much time in a 10 minute game looking for a tactic that may not be in the position? That might tell you whether you should play longer games if you want to benefit from your tactical skills.
I guess that this is on point.