the order i get this position from doesnt allow me to play ba6
QID petrosian system 4.a3
Sometimes I'll screw around with QID and Nimzos in blitz.
This is a pretty comfortable position (below) in fact I prefer black.
You call it a big center, I call it a big target.
Anyway, if you don't like it, then pick something else. 4...Ba6 is a major alternative. You can also go for what seems to me to be a QGD with 4...Be7 and d5 to follow.
If it's important for your repertoire to be able to play 4...Bb7 positions, then use chessgames.com, get 50 or 100 games, and go over them / play guess the move with them. Take notes. By the end of that process you'll be comfortable with the positions.
i have gone over these positions with the engine but i dont buy it. black plays c5 white plays c3, some swap happens, and now black has no good pawn thrust. some exchanges happen in the c file and i dont see good counterplay for black. its a bit of a simplification, but i just dont see any big winning chances. the statistics give white like an 80% chance to not lose in these passive lines
whats interesting is that the position arising from 1.e4 b6 with the early bd3 lines i find enough counterplay either through ba6 or the queenside pawn storm but in these QID lines the lack trade of the d pawn for the b pawn i feel softens black's counterplay.
I've won some very nice cc games using this as White. My bible is Mikhail Gurevich's book on the QID Petrosian system. He wrote the section of ECO that covers this opening. Objectively, it shouldn't lead to an advantage for White, but it leads to complex positions where the player who is better versed in the subtleties of the opening will have a large competitive edge.
Here's a link to that great little book by Gurevich:
Hi, im interested to hear what you guys play against the annoying 4.a3 in the QID