We're the same rating. I thought "dynamic chess" was akin to a "sharp postion"? Where there are many different ways to approach the postion, and it's rich with tactical possibilities?
questions
Sort:
Sep 5, 2011
0
#3
I just don't understand dynamic chess at all, from what I've been reading isolated queen pawn postions are dynamic for the person that owns the IQP
I think Silman's book does a good job explaining this. Basically static stuff is long-term positional advantages and disadvantages that can only be used after a lot of time and don't change very much (material, pawn structure). Dynamic stuff is the opposite of that; short-term advantages that need to be used immediately or they'll go away (king safety, piece activity). Dynamic chess is generally used to describe the style in which a player favors dynamic imbalances over static ones.
Lights_Out wrote:
I just don't understand dynamic chess at all, from what I've been reading isolated queen pawn postions are dynamic for the person that owns the IQP
That's right, because the isolated pawn is a long term weakness (static) that the side without the IQP seeks to take advantage of later in the game. The side without the IQP plays defensively to reach an advantageous endgame. The side with the IQP generally has more active pieces because of extra space (dynamic), so they need to play aggressively.
Sep 5, 2011
0
#6
oinquarki wrote:
I think Silman's book does a good job explaining this. Basically static stuff is long-term positional advantages and disadvantages that can only be used after a lot of time and don't change very much (material, pawn structure). Dynamic stuff is the opposite of that; short-term advantages that need to be used immediately or they'll go away (king safety, piece activity). Dynamic chess is generally used to describe the style in which a player favors dynamic imbalances over static ones.
Do you know any openings for black or white that are dynamic?
Lights_Out wrote: Do you know any openings for black or white that are dynamic?
No, not really.
Dec 7, 2011
0
#8
Lights_Out wrote:
oinquarki wrote:
I think Silman's book does a good job explaining this. Basically static stuff is long-term positional advantages and disadvantages that can only be used after a lot of time and don't change very much (material, pawn structure). Dynamic stuff is the opposite of that; short-term advantages that need to be used immediately or they'll go away (king safety, piece activity). Dynamic chess is generally used to describe the style in which a player favors dynamic imbalances over static ones.
Do you know any openings for black or white that are dynamic?
Grünfeld is a dynamic opening. And of course real gambits.
What is dynamic chess? How does this pertain to stragety? Also, how do you study openings and chess games? ( I don't want to just memorize moves because I still don't understand)
Lights out