Quick chess analysis needs an improvement.

Sort:
IvnKaramazov

Yes I realize that we are not paying but the quick chess analysis makes some grave errors that probably throw a lot of people off. Check out one of my games and what the quick analysis suggests on move 45

 

WhaaT? on a move where there is an obvious mate in seven for white, the computer puts the evaluation at -0.87! Note that it may be different for you, because it`s quite inconsistent. When I was starting out at chess I used this tool heavily to analyze my tournament games - there should be an option of beyond split-second analysis. A competing site has one but it`s inconvenient and the position analysis tool hereon chess.com is quite good. So why can`t that be done for full games? a computer should not be unable to see a forced mate in 7 moves. 

 

 

notmtwain

It saw the mate in 8 immediately (less than half a second) when I ran it (after 44.. Nb5).  Maybe your phone needs an upgrate or it's time for you to get rid of Windows 95.

IvnKaramazov

 @notmtwain No, of course the analysis thatchess.com has that`s done by position (when you click under learn, then analysis, the tool that analzyes one particular position) is quite good and powerful. I`m talking about, when you finish a game, there`s the box that says "quick" analysis up until "maximum," and it plays out the game and comments as it goes (with things like blunders, mistakes, inaccuracies, and the average difference).

gamerwolf4849
Well mine says that's mate on your move dude