I think the rating calculations on chess.com needs some updating.
I lost my first standard game to a player rated 1300 and had my rating set to 400. I lost on time in the opening because I forgot to login on time. ok fine!
After that game I have played 14 games with no losses against players rated from 800 up to 1600. My current rating is around 1500. This is very strange to me. The site should not take so much consideration the that first game I think. Freechess for instance has a better and more accurate way of calculating such things.
The site uses the Glicko rating system that includes a measure of rating uncertainty called the rating deviation (RD) value. A player's RD value is high at the beginning and games will have high rating changes. After more games get played the RD value drops as will the magnitude of rating changes.
Your initial loss had very little impact on your rating gain due to the way Glicko works and you would likely be in a similar position now even if you hadn't lost that first one.
I think the rating calculations on chess.com needs some updating.
I lost my first standard game to a player rated 1300 and had my rating set to 400. I lost on time in the opening because I forgot to login on time. ok fine!
After that game I have played 14 games with no losses against players rated from 800 up to 1600. My current rating is around 1500. This is very strange to me. The site should not take so much consideration the that first game I think. Freechess for instance has a better and more accurate way of calculating such things.