Rating

Sort:
Avatar of SaurabhJ131

What is the rating for someone to consider you a "good" player?  I am not sure what the actuall rating is.  Someone once told me that it was 1400+ but i question that opinion.

Avatar of rooperi

Good is a relative term.

I think a 1200 on this site is probably good enough to beat 80% of all players anywhere who know the rules. Does that make him good? I don't know.

Avatar of Foxje2003

1800 i think is goood :d

Avatar of doric1

You are only as good as your opponent lets you be LOL

Avatar of ichabod801

Someone 200 points higher than you.

Avatar of SaurabhJ131

Im sure there's no actual rating but what is the average in your opinion?

Avatar of BigOto
Yodina wrote:

What is the rating for someone to consider you a "good" player?  I am not sure what the actuall rating is.  Someone once told me that it was 1400+ but i question that opinion.


1200 is the average rating, so "Good" in my opinion is anybody above 1200. People above 2000 are usually chess masters.

Avatar of chessoholicalien

But there's a big difference between chess.com ratings and actual OTB ratings...

Avatar of Blackadder
BigOto wrote:
Yodina wrote:

What is the rating for someone to consider you a "good" player?  I am not sure what the actuall rating is.  Someone once told me that it was 1400+ but i question that opinion.


1200 is the average rating, so "Good" in my opinion is anybody above 1200. People above 2000 are usually chess masters.


no we are not.

Masters, on here, tend to be 2200-2400.

Avatar of Diet_Coke

I consider 2500+ to be good on this site.

Avatar of mark_sotto

in my own point of view .... 

1200-1600

1601-1800

1801-2000

2001-2300

2301+

 

 

thats how i divide and anticipate their strengths...

Avatar of jchurch5566
ichabod801 wrote:

Someone 200 points higher than you.


Hi guys,

 I agree with Ichabod! 

Additionally, if there is no one 200 points higher than you, ... then you are good!

Watch your backrank.

Avatar of SaurabhJ131
jchurch5566 wrote:
ichabod801 wrote:

Someone 200 points higher than you.


NO because that means nothing

Avatar of ichabod801

Really Yodina? (I'm assuming that's your statement that a 200 point rating difference is meaningless, and not jchurch's as you've attributed it). What's your record against people rated 200 points higher than you?

Avatar of pinkpawn97

i think it dosent matter, i mean, anyone can be a good player, it dosent matter how many points they have.... i think. ♪♫♪

Avatar of Skwerly

i tend to agree that 1800+ is when one starts becoming "good".  it's hard to beat an 1800 player if they are on their game.  i remember when i was 1800 - i thought was a lot better than i actually was lol.  but i was beginning to understand theory, openings, stuff like that.  it's fun!

 

forgive lower case, i'm on my netbook and it's friggin hard to type on lol.

Avatar of Blitz55

Im going to reach  ZERO  I just know it.

Avatar of SaurabhJ131
pinkpawn97 wrote:

i think it dosent matter, i mean, anyone can be a good player, it dosent matter how many points they have.... i think. ♪♫♪


I agree with pinkpawn97.  When my rating was 1100 i was able to beat a player at almost 1800 so it is skill, not r ating that counts