Haha.
But ok. Because you can't unlearn things I think the biggest difficulty would be consistency. Anyone can blunder a queen on move 5 then lose the game. To play like a real U1000 player would be harder.
The most important thing would probably be, even if you choose to develop most of your pieces in the opening, to then play with only 1 or 2 pieces at a time in series of 3 to 5 moves. For example on 3 consecutive mvoes you can't move a rook, bishop, and queen. Also 9 out of 10 possible equal trades must be made as soon as possible, and 9 out of 10 times a check is available it must be played as soon as possible.
To help simulate blunders, you should probably cover the opponent's first 3 ranks with a sheet of paper 2 out of every 3 moves for the first 20 moves. Later, if the current two pieces you're using to make random threats are on the kingside, then cover the opponent's queenside quadrant.
Hmm, probably a few more little rules here and there. For example you're not allowed to take a free piece every time it's available. But you probably can over half the time.
Multiple topics are posted that frequently ask about rating and if chess.com ratings compare to over the board ratings. More over, I see a variety of people asking how to improve their chess game in order to show off a better rating.
My question is, how can I reduce my rating to under 1000? Exactly, what will I need to unlearn to achieve my goal? Is it even worth it to gain a rating of under 1000? If I cut out the tactics trainer, stop checking for blunders, and searching for the best move, will I then be able to rank under 1000 or will it take something more like avoiding all opening rules and theory?