little_guinea_pig wrote:
I don't think he's here anymore. You seem to be his kryptonite lol...
Nah, he's his own kryptonite. I just activate the kryptonite... if that makes any sense lol.
Recommendations at getting better?
Sort:
Mar 17, 2021
0
#23
"Sometimes the things that make the most sense in life are the things that don't make sense at all."
-The greatest philosopher of all time.
Mar 17, 2021
0
#24
Well... Plato didn't write it.
Neither did Aristotle.
Nor any other famous philosopher.
So it has to be me!
Mar 17, 2021
0
#25
little_guinea_pig wrote:
you're not the greatest philosopher xD
You're right.
But I am the goodest!
Mar 17, 2021
0
#26
little_guinea_pig wrote:
*crickets*
It's, like, the early afternoon.
How are their crickets????
Maybe I'm a highly skilled cricket attracter. They came to see what knowledge I'd spread next!
Mar 17, 2021
0
#27
I meant to do possessive.
I'm just on a higher level of grammar than you.
Mar 17, 2021
0
#28
little_guinea_pig wrote:
no you didn't and no you aren't lol
False. I was of the past a minute ago, so it should have been no you weren't.
Haha, wrong grammar.
Mar 17, 2021
0
#29
Wow, and you can't think of solid responses... As usual. "Hmmm... What should I do, maybe just insult." Come on. You're more boring than the exchange French.
Read this again. Perhaps 2, 3, idk maybe even 1000 times. You seem to have deliberately misunderstood my point, based on, again, your insults.
It's like someone saying, "Hey, stop eating apples. It's weird."
Then they keep on eating apples, acknowledging their statement, but then they turn the conversation to oranges.
It's a strange analogy I admit, but maybe you can bring together your remaining brain cells together instead of going on a mindless insult rage again, ok? 
Mar 17, 2021
0
#30
You might want to keep this as a reminder. Learning how to not being redundantly redundant is a great life skill!
Mar 17, 2021
0
#32
Wow, and you can't think of solid responses... As usual. "Hmmm... What should I do, maybe just insult." Come on. You're more boring than the exchange French.
Read this again. Perhaps 2, 3, idk maybe even 1000 times. You seem to have deliberately misunderstood my point, based on, again, your insults.
It's like someone saying, "Hey, stop eating apples. It's weird."
Then they keep on eating apples, acknowledging their statement, but then they turn the conversation to oranges.
It's a strange analogy I admit, but maybe you can bring together your remaining brain cells together instead of going on a mindless insult rage again, ok?
Mar 17, 2021
0
#33
Do us all a favor, prove you can read, read what I just copied and pasted from earlier comments, and find and correct the many mistakes in your writing. Deal?
It will help you grow as a writer.
Mar 17, 2021
0
#34
Ignoring and counterattacking with the same useless attack every time?
So predicable. 
You know, all this arguing is pretty fun. I think we'll be great friends one day.
Mar 17, 2021
0
#35
Carlsens-Daddy wrote:
CrusaderKing1 wrote: Carlsens-Daddy wrote:
What did practice do for you, moron? All of your ratings are under 1000, lol.
I'm an elitist because I'm good at a BoArD GaMe.
Dude, being too dumb to learn how to play chess, as your 877 bullet and 753 blitz ratings PROVE beyond all doubt, doesn't somehow magically make you a winner in life, lol. It's quite the opposite. You spend hours and hours loitering around the forums of a chess server yet you're too mentally weak for chess. What that says is that you're a LOSER with no life who can't figure out anything else to do.
Now I know you're going to try to impress me with some BS about how you make millions of dollars a year, have the best looking women, etc, but none of that is true. You're just a ugly dork with a nose that's probably bigger than your little wank (you're the fool who made the mistake of putting your real pic in your profile), who lacks the intelligence for chess as well as any other activities that involve thinking. I make fun of people with TWICE your rating for being weak. You are the WEAKEST OF THE WEAK!
I'm a medical surgeon who also went to chemistry graduate school, who decided to pick up chess over winter break.
Your only self-worth is in a board game, which is why I had to call out your pathetic life when you start telling others they aren't smart because they aren't as high rated as you in a board game.
Mar 17, 2021
0
#36
CrusaderKing1 wrote:
Carlsens-Daddy wrote:
CrusaderKing1 wrote: Carlsens-Daddy wrote:
What did practice do for you, moron? All of your ratings are under 1000, lol.
I'm an elitist because I'm good at a BoArD GaMe.
Dude, being too dumb to learn how to play chess, as your 877 bullet and 753 blitz ratings PROVE beyond all doubt, doesn't somehow magically make you a winner in life, lol. It's quite the opposite. You spend hours and hours loitering around the forums of a chess server yet you're too mentally weak for chess. What that says is that you're a LOSER with no life who can't figure out anything else to do.
Now I know you're going to try to impress me with some BS about how you make millions of dollars a year, have the best looking women, etc, but none of that is true. You're just a ugly dork with a nose that's probably bigger than your little wank (you're the fool who made the mistake of putting your real pic in your profile), who lacks the intelligence for chess as well as any other activities that involve thinking. I make fun of people with TWICE your rating for being weak. You are the WEAKEST OF THE WEAK!
I'm a medical surgeon who also went to chemistry graduate school, who decided to pick up chess over winter break.
Your only self-worth is in a board game, which is why I had to call out your pathetic life when you start telling others they aren't smart because they aren't as high rated as you in a board game.
+1
Mar 17, 2021
0
#37
Carlsens-Daddy wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Ha, don't listen to this guy. Just the same troll over and over with me accounts.
That makes PERFECT sense. Don't listen to the 2450 guy who is in the top 99.8% of all chess players. Listen to the slow and stupid low IQ RETARD with the 664 bullet and 887 blitz ratings who can't make two moves in a row without blundering, lol.
You just played three bullet games. Your rating is just provisional and does not mean anything. Maybe you have just an ultra fast connection.
Mar 17, 2021
0
#38
Carlsens-Daddy wrote:
@GayCruiser_King1
You have played almost 1800 (THAT'S EIGHTEEN HUNDRED) games here yet you are still less than HALF the rating of those that I could spot a queen to and still win easily.
You have a PROVEN PATHOLOGICALLY LOW IQ!
Before the era of political correctness, the only thing to debate was whether or not you could be called a IDIOT, MORON, OR IMBECILE as those words refer to specific IQ ranges to which you definitely fall into!
You are too STUPID for chess and also too STUPID to be able to discuss chess. You do not belong here. Take your zucchini nose and go find a special needs group where you talk among your peers!
troll 9/10
Mar 17, 2021
0
#39
Carlsens-Daddy wrote:
@Edwuss2017
I've played hundreds of thousands of games. But the fact that you're too stupid to understand the chess.com isn't the only place in the world to play chess, nor that one account isn't necessarily the only account a chess.com member has ever had, explains why you are incapable of learning how to play this game and are only 1500 rated. I'm almost 1000 elo stronger than you are. I maintain a 2400+ rating consistently, even on lichess. If I'm hungover it will dip down to the 2300's, but then I easily bring it back up over 2400. This is all so far over what your tiny weak little mind could ever even DREAM of doing. You are a 1500 player, LMAO! I could literally lose 90% of my brain due to a parasite and STILL spot you a queen AND time and win every game easily.
It's literally the equivalent of comparing an inchworm to Elon Musk. Aside from chess, you can't figure anything at all out in any area. A faster internet doesn't help anyone. The server compensates the slower connection.
You're a frustrated LOSER who sucks at everything you do!
1. You are not able to read. I am not 1500, but rather 1800.
2. The Ratings of the other chess site "L." are inflated. If you are 2400 there, you are appr. 2100-2200 in chess.com. I have a 2050 rating at "L.".
Mar 17, 2021
0
#40
Wow, and you can't think of solid responses... As usual. "Hmmm... What should I do, maybe just insult." Come on. You're more boring than the exchange French.
Read this again. Perhaps 2, 3, idk maybe even 1000 times. You seem to have deliberately misunderstood my point, based on, again, your insults.
It's like someone saying, "Hey, stop eating apples. It's weird."
Then they keep on eating apples, acknowledging their statement, but then they turn the conversation to oranges.
It's a strange analogy I admit, but maybe you can bring together your remaining brain cells together instead of going on a mindless insult rage again, ok? wink.png
Sorry Carlsens-Daddy.
I had to tell the truth about you. Good thing you can still change