Not that this thread hasn't been fascinating to read through with all the sexism and transphobia, but I wanted to throw in a paragraph I found on this site called chessquestions.com where they've given a mathematical answer.
|
However, WFM Rodrigo also mentions “cultural” reasons. Translated into mathematical terms I think she is suggesting that females have a lower mean (average) FIDE rating than males. This we can check by loading the latest FIDE rating data into a database and doing some SQL queries.
Doing that gives us:
Female – Mean = 1505, standard deviation = 339
Male – Mean = 1675, standard deviation = 346
We see that there is little difference between male and female standard deviation but the mean female ELO is 170 points lower than the mean male ELO. This is half a standard deviation which is a lot. It looks to me that WFM Rodrigo is right about this too.
Comparing these figures with the rating differences between the open (there are no male-only titles) titles and the female-only titles it looks like FIDE are being generous to the females by a margin of 30 points. Perhaps they rounded the difference up to the nearest hundred?
Link: https://chessquestions.com/wfm-in-chess-womens-chess-titles-explained/
Has a woman posted here yet?
May not see one. At least not one making a serious comment.
This thread has turned into a stupid 'are women smart enough for chess' type thread and that subject has been done to death.
There are probably "are men smart enough to take care of the house while mom is gone or does he need some guidance" type threads too somewhere on the internet though.