I don't love chess engines, but I'm not against them. I feel they've opened our minds to other ways of attack and play as well as help us get better(computer analysis).
Say YES to Chess Engines*

I don't love chess engines, but I'm not against them. I feel they've opened our minds to other ways of attack and play as well as help us get better(computer analysis).
That's fine, I'll accept ambivalence...

But wouldn't you agree that after we play a human (feline?) game of chess, it's often helpful to be able to analyze the game with an engine to find our mistakes/blunders? I don't have a strong chess friend that can help me out multiple times a day.

I really enjoy watching grandmaster games with engine analysis. There is no way most mere mortals can know what is really happening in a game at that level without an engine. Even GM commentators often miss the subtleties that are present in those games. Without an engine, its just a bunch of moves that look fine, with very little understanding beyond that.

im more inclined to reject chess engine use ,as it is open to being abused , there is also the way even the best masters are crushed by engines ,
granted this raises the standard of chess but with a computers ability to crunch so many lines analysis in a scant few moments , its an unlevel playing field
the post game analysis engines can do is helpful if you access that and take on board the things shown , but you could also just get your mates down the local chess club to go over games for pointers
but these chess engines are here to stay I guess and for them its get with the programme , or not , I prefer the latter option

Bob: There isn't one top GM int he world not using engines.
Alice: but that doesn't count because they are just trying to get better.
Bob: Case closed.
If engines do make chess worse..then do not use them for any purpose from now on..we will see how you live
Chess engines are enhancing this game. I would like to see more engine lovers.
*This is an equal-opportunity chess thread!