Shameless Bullet Players 🤬

Sort:
Masked_Titan3000
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have  . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

my bullet is only +300 higher than blitz, am I doing a mistake?

chamo2074
Masked_Titan3000 wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have  . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

my bullet is only +300 higher than blitz, am I doing a mistake?

It's not about being, it's about bragging about being which is the problem

Masked_Titan3000

I'm curious how Anonymous Dragon brings so many individuals(or bots) into his forums...

 

But yeah, this forum has a point

Masked_Titan3000
chamo2074 wrote:
Masked_Titan3000 wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have  . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

my bullet is only +300 higher than blitz, am I doing a mistake?

It's not about being, it's about bragging about being which is the problem

Thanks!

Anonymous_Dragon

Almost everyone who has played enough bullet games has had a win under 0.01 seconds which is the most satisfying

adapro123

hello 

 

JackRoach
Masked_Titan3000 wrote:

I'm curious how Anonymous Dragon brings so many individuals(or bots) into his forums...

 

But yeah, this forum has a point

Because they have lots of people following them.

Anonymous_Dragon
JackRoach wrote:
Masked_Titan3000 wrote:

I'm curious how Anonymous Dragon brings so many individuals(or bots) into his forums...

 

But yeah, this forum has a point

Because they have lots of people following them.

That's true , but there are some that popped out of nowhere

Anonymous_Dragon
indianplayer06 wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Masked_Titan3000 wrote:

I'm curious how Anonymous Dragon brings so many individuals(or bots) into his forums...

 

But yeah, this forum has a point

Because they have lots of people following them.

That's true , but there are some that popped out of nowhere

People making new accounts just to open their heart and speak here 

Yeah

JackRoach
indianplayer06 wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Masked_Titan3000 wrote:

I'm curious how Anonymous Dragon brings so many individuals(or bots) into his forums...

 

But yeah, this forum has a point

Because they have lots of people following them.

That's true , but there are some that popped out of nowhere

People making new accounts just to open their heart and speak here 

Opening your heart....

That doesn't sound healthy at all.

 

GIDtheKiD99
I play bullet on a phone XD I don’t play hard core ches
chamo2074

@Jackroach the guy must be getting paid a huge salary for opening hearts (get the joke or r/woosh)

AunTheKnight

Ha, ha.

notacoolperson

It is there lose no need to criticize. 

Anonymous_Dragon
notacoolperson wrote:

It is there lose no need to criticize. 

I cannot even read what s*** u write

1g31-O
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have  . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

mad cuz bad. contrary to common opinion, bullet is depends a lot less on mouse skill and internet than it sounds.

Anonymous_Dragon
1g31-O wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

I know am gonna get a lot of criticism for my views but I still want to express them. I have zero respect for players who's bullet is around 700+ points above their rapid / blitz/ daily. 

The reason being , is that it simply implies that you are bad at the game and just rely on your fast mouse , better internet to win games and you do not possess the skills that a person of your rating must have  . 

Now don't get me wrong . I understand there are people who just play bullet all their life and have never really played any other format , hence they are underrated in other formats. I haven't included them in my criticism . I see players being 600-700 blitz after around 3000 games and 1400+ bullet after a similar game span. This is ridiculous.

mad cuz bad. contrary to common opinion, bullet is depends a lot less on mouse skill and internet than it sounds.

Why can't people understand that , that's not what I meant to say ?

Burgermaniac
chessknight222 wrote:

and bullet is a great way to improve your intuition and improve your nerves under pressure

+1

2Ke21-0

My bullet is rating is 7000 rating points above my actual playing strength.

Sammy_Thechessboy
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

Almost everyone who has played enough bullet games has had a win under 0.01 seconds which is the most satisfying

That would be satisfying but I never got one cuz I just outright suck at bullet (and blitz at that matter)