Chess is probably the most popular game in the world. It should be there.
Should Chess Be Part Of The Olympics?
Only if it is classical chess. And I mean _classical_ (like the time control they used in the last candidates, none of that under one hour GRENKE nonsense). This may entice Magnus Carsen to come back to playing real chess.
Yes, sitting and trying to focus for hours may be quite demanding physically. You youngsters with an attention span of a goldfish may not realize it but it is true.
I don't care one way or another, I just want Magnus to come back because he likes collecting titles. And I want him to lose so that he comes back again.
Questionable. But even if true, what use is it to us if he does not play?
Chess is greater than the Olympics and should stand alone...
It has its own history, superstars, and scandals...
Brianna
While there is a good argument that chess is a sport, I dont think the people who watch the Olympics would enjoy watching chess.
Some obviously would, but the vast majority wont.
Those who want chess in the Olympics should play Rapid. The players are seated 100 meters away from the chess table. They have to dash to the table when it's their turn to move. The clock is in thei seating place. Dashing back and forth until one is checkmated, resigned, threefold repetition of a positive or clock runs out. There is no need to implement the 50 move draw rule.
@SamK1396
"Olympic" doesn't have to mean physical.
Western chess, Chinese chess, and Go are in the Asian Games.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_Games
But we're not talking about the Asian Games!