Should one feel happy or sad on winning on time ?

this was a rapid game i was in a very bad position in this game but i still manage to win because i had time on clock

you should be happy any time you win

Lol thanks 

This is absolutely correct. The clock is as much a part of the game as the board and pieces. If your opponent can't manage the clock, you deserve to win, just the same as if your opponent made bad moves.

you should be happy any time, even if you lose

thanks this gives me new perspective 

No offence mam but that's quite unrealistic to me 

LOL poor guy 9 queens lol 

sure thanks man 

most people would choose to be happy just because being happy beats being sad hands down, but chess players tend to over analyze everything.

It is a chess player's responsibility to manage his use of time. To claim that a player lost the game only because he ran out of time is just as ridiculous as a driver claiming that he had an accident only because he was drunk.

clocks are totally necessary in case some joker falls asleep or dies at the board.

Sometimes a player gets lucky and wins, but I wouldn't call the clock lucky. Players can watch their time and speed up or slow down appropriately.

If your opponent fails to speed up then the position was too complicated for them, or they weren't disciplined enough to speed up. Either way it was their lack of skill that lead to a time loss.

In your game you continued to make threats until the end, and they were too difficult for your opponent to solve in time.

I would much rather lose because I was outplayed than lose on time or lose due to a silly blunder.

In fact if someone plays exceptionally well against me, I almost don't feel bad about the loss at all because it was a beautiful game from my perspective.