Stuff Non-Chess Players Say

Sort:
winerkleiner

Sundresses.

bhoopalan

Awesome.. where's that like button

BigLew wrote:

megadroid wrote:

Can a king and queen make more pawns?

Of course that is how you teach children, especially girls, to set up the pieces at the begining of the game. So they can remember.

1st: Tell them that the king and queen are geting married and the queen's shoes have to match her dress.  (queen on own color square)

2nd: they get maried by the bisshop. (bishops are a adjacent to the royal family)

3rd: Then after they get married they run off on a horse to live in a castle. So that the knight and rook go on the next sqaures.  

4th: They live hapily ever after and have 8 little children  happily playing in the front yard.  So pawns go on the next row in front of the other pieces. 

Taught my daughter to set the pieces up ike that when she was about 4 years old , Now a fifth grader she has never forgotten.  

dragonair234

I don't know but there's a quote button if you ever manage to find that. ha. 

EDB123

well, thats how you teach peope to use the internet. lol

bhoopalan

Hmmm.. am not newto internet.. just new to mobile Internet

jivvi
halfpointsausage wrote:

When are you going all-in ?

http://www.pokerstrategy.com/news/world-of-poker/+EV-Cartoon-of-the-Day-212_78100/

jivvi
chasm1995 wrote:
varelse1 wrote:

Or one I heard recently."You mean Chess masters realy spend hours playing a single game? How is that possible?? Wouldn't they just know what to do?'

Must admit, I didn't know quite how to answer that one.

How about something like, there are so many possibilities in a chess game, just 200 in the first move, and only a few are actually good moves, so they take a long time trying to figure out which move is best.

There are 400 possibilities in the first move, not 200.

jivvi
dragonair234 wrote:
icyfire77 wrote:
dragonair234 wrote: 

5 moves

HAAA....!!! Maybe he miscalculated the knight's L shape..... you shoulda seen a game where I lost in less than 10 moves..... ouchie lol

Have a look at the one where I lost in 7 moves.

http://www.chess.com/blog/jivvi/not-the-best-game-ive-ever-played2

dragonair234
jivvi wrote:
dragonair234 wrote:
icyfire77 wrote:
dragonair234 wrote: 

5 moves

HAAA....!!! Maybe he miscalculated the knight's L shape..... you shoulda seen a game where I lost in less than 10 moves..... ouchie lol

Have a look at the one where I lost in 7 moves.

http://www.chess.com/blog/jivvi/not-the-best-game-ive-ever-played2

That's beautiful. 

dragonair234
bhoopalan wrote:

Hmmm.. am not newto internet.. just new to mobile Internet

Whether you're actually new or not, this is too good not to pass on:

winerkleiner

Very colorful, the truth is out there!

A-Watchful-Guardian

"I found it on the internet so it must be true!"

winerkleiner

The more I find the more I believe.

BigLew

My neighbor, who's in her 70's, and likes to play dominos, said to me on Saturday about chess; "Why would I want to play a game that takes 3 days to move?"

I said; "What"

She said; "it takes days to move"

Me: "No it doesn't. Most casual games last last between 10 minutes and an hour, average of 40 moves a game."

Her: "Well I don't suppose I've ever seen people play chess then. Except on TV where it takes them days to make a move. "

Me: "Why did you watch a chess match that took days to move? Besides chess has been rarely shown on American television. In the 19th century before they had clocks some people might have stalled for days, but they didn't have tv then either."

Her: "Yes they did have tv in the 19th century, I watched Fischer play that Soviet guy back in the '70s. "

Me: "That was the 1900's not the 19th ceyntury, and they had clocks and it didn't take days to move though the games may have taken a few hours."

Her: "yeah, you're right 1900's, but chess is still boring"

Me: "I find it facinating."

Her: "To each his own."

We changed the topic to what to cook for Easter.

Of course I didn't even mention her that I play online chess.com chess on my phone and it sometimes takes days to move. LOL

Wind

"why did you move it two squares ahead? i thought you said "one square per move"

jivvi
December_TwentyNine wrote:

Also, when you type ++, are you referring to a double check or mate? In algebraic notation, I always thought that ++ was double check and # was mate.

Originally, † is check, †† is double check, (†) is discovered check, and ‡ is checkmate, but the dagger symbols were replaced by +, and the double dagger by #, due to being easily reproducible on a computer keyboard. There was a brief period of ambiguity where some used ++ to mean checkmate, but I don't think that was ever standard. Also, I've noticed that in PGN files, a single + without brackets is also used for check, whether double, discovered or otherwise, which is probably just a limitation of the PGN format and isn't really ambiguous, but curiously, # is also used for stalemate, which to me at least, seems very strange.

dragonair234
Magnis_Carlsin_Jr wrote:

"Scrabble is the best board game because you actually have to use you're brain"

Nice username ;D

dragonair234
Newba wrote:

"why did you move it two squares ahead? i thought you said "one square per move"

***Laughing

dragonair234
BigLew wrote:

...

We changed the topic to what to cook for Easter.

 

Of course I didn't even mention her that I play online chess.com chess on my phone and it sometimes takes days to move. LOL

Easter meals yummy :)

Maybe you should've mentioned the chess.com app! We need more women chess players! She might thank you one day. Yeah it is a misunderstanding that chess takes "days" but you just change the time control. That's all. It's not like you're thinking for hours about one move. 

I'm thinking about starting a campaign on my college campus next semester to promote more women chess players. Any bright ideas anyone? Tongue OutLaughing

jivvi
December_TwentyNine wrote:

You know what's Ironic, is that when I went to the cafe this evening, one of the baristas was telling me, that there are 2 parks here in town that have engraved boards. I didn't even know...

...but anyways I did a google search as Irontiger suggested

That board looks right to me. Usually on (for example) a wooden board the light squares are the same colour as the area surrounding the squares, but not so in this case. The grey squares are clearly darker than the red squares, and look like they may have originally been blacker and since faded somewhat. In any case, light certainly is on the right, although the light squares stand out from the background more than the dark ones, which is the opposite of the norm.