Silman's chess lesson problem from Roots of Positional Understanding series

Sort:
Avatar of iresignindisgust

The problem:

https://www.chess.com/lessons/motoc-assad-1996-world-youth-festival-girls-under-12

the text: "Black has to come up with a useful and clear plan. This is easy to say but very difficult to do! Both sides enjoy solid positions. White has the choice of two plans: 1) he can seek central expansion with an eventual f2-f3 followed by e3-e4. 2) he can play for a minority attack (this seeks to create weak squares and pawns in Black's queenside pawn structure) with b2-b4-b5. Black's Knight on d6 eyes b5, c4, e4, and f5 and is clearly well-placed. However, an actual Black plan is still a bit of a mystery. What would you do with the second player's position?"

I tried almost every possible move before stumbling on the answer, which doesn't make any sense to me. The answer is g6, but is this not the grievous error of advancing a King's protective pawn, and at the same time, creating dreaded 'weak squares' around the black King?

Chess seems so full of contradictions, but clearly that's why my playing level has been stagnant for about a decade...

Avatar of justbefair
vivement wrote:

The problem:

https://www.chess.com/lessons/motoc-assad-1996-world-youth-festival-girls-under-12

the text: "Black has to come up with a useful and clear plan. This is easy to say but very difficult to do! Both sides enjoy solid positions. White has the choice of two plans: 1) he can seek central expansion with an eventual f2-f3 followed by e3-e4. 2) he can play for a minority attack (this seeks to create weak squares and pawns in Black's queenside pawn structure) with b2-b4-b5. Black's Knight on d6 eyes b5, c4, e4, and f5 and is clearly well-placed. However, an actual Black plan is still a bit of a mystery. What would you do with the second player's position?"

I tried almost every possible move before stumbling on the answer, which doesn't make any sense to me. The answer is g6, but is this not the grievous error of advancing a King's protective pawn, and at the same time, creating dreaded 'weak squares' around the black King?

Chess seems so full of contradictions, but clearly that's why my playing level has been stagnant for about a decade...

 
Seems to make sense to load the position here.
 
If you agree that one of white's logical plans is to play f3 and e4, then surely finding a way to oppose that plan would make sense. 
 
You can't play Nh5 immediately to go after white bishop on f4 because you would lose your pawn on h7. The defensive move g6 does blunt the attack of the queen bishop battery.
 
I guess it does weaken the dark squares but if you ware planning on going after white's dark square bishop, maybe it's an acceptable plan.