Not again. You show very poor skill to checkmate the op earlier.
Some People Don't Know When to Resign
Sort:
Resigning is an option, not a mandate.
You could have done a blunder and made it a stalemate. That's a chance
LOL!!! 7 queens is a bit much, don't you think?
Jun 26, 2015
0
#6
You had 11 chances to go wrong because 128. Qb1, Qb2, Qb3, Qb6, Qd6, Qe5, Qff4, Qhf4, Qg3, Qh2 and Rb7 were all stalemate. 
missjessica77 wrote:
LOL!!! 7 queens is a bit much, don't you think?
cmon 7 is normal man 
after avoiding the first stalemates around move 55, the rest was easy, i just blocked my own queens 
a brilliancy, well played
Some people don't know when to checkmate.
It would be rather hilarious to see you accidentally stalemate someone by promoting to that many queens. Make knights instead. C'mon. Real ballers will take a K + B + P endgame and promote that pawn to a knight. Pfft... low rated players. LOL!
Yes, we could do with a few "outlaw stalemate!!" threads by guys who got burned.
....there is no rule that dictates resignation. One plays the game. I prefer not giving up even when I have obviously (& often) lost. So what. It becomes more about your failure to checkmate rather than my failure to win. 
Doing this in an actual tournament can get you disqualified. It is extremely unsportsman like and quite rude to your opponent.
Your opponent has no obligation to resign at any point, you do have an obligation to finish the game as soon as you are capable of finishing it.
On top of that you are gloating about what you have done.
hehe Migilla you should have protected all your pawns in that totally winning endgame then promote 1 knight, 1 bishop, 2 rooks and 1 queen, then put all the pieces to the starting position
thanks for the comments guys, if you have time visit my blog Chessassin's Creed
What aggravates me is when a player who knows that they cannot win delays the outcome of the game by only making a move at the absolute last second. I have a game like this right now against Bahamachessmate who is much higher rated than myself, so he/she is delaying the game's end because of the inevitable large rating drop
Draygo wrote:
Doing this in an actual tournament can get you disqualified. It is extremely unsportsman like and quite rude to your opponent.
Your opponent has no obligation to resign at any point, you do have an obligation to finish the game as soon as you are capable of finishing it.
On top of that you are gloating about what you have done.
What?
I've heard this before. People think a chess.com score/rating actually matters. No offence guys, but unless you are a masterclass, chess.com can only be indicative. It's playing & enjoying playing that matters. Just saying. Or hoping.
Annoying as it can be , some players just never resign , thats their right within the rules of the game.
However , this fact doesnt disguise how unsporting and childish the OP looks by dragging out the posted game for another 60+ moves more than was necessary.
Winning with dignity & honour is rarely explained in chess books.........
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1197338669
Here is the final position!
Checkmate by the creed, resign by the creed!
Chessassin's Creed