JackieTheSwede wrote:
Should count as a win. Why? I don't know - my perspective - that's it. Love you all.
For which side?
Stalemate
Sort:
notmtwain wrote:
JackieTheSwede wrote:
Should count as a win. Why? I don't know - my perspective - that's it. Love you all.
For which side?
The weak side.
If you stalemate you're opponent, it is a draw.
Whether this is fair or not is still debated upon.
Some say that it makes endgames and the like more complex.
Whether this is fair or not is still debated upon.
Some say that it makes endgames and the like more complex.
Wait... Why would it be a win for the side that cannot move?
The reason stalemate is a draw is because checkmate has not been delivered (the winning goal). So it is a draw since the game cannot progress (for the player has to move).
The reason stalemate is a draw is because checkmate has not been delivered (the winning goal). So it is a draw since the game cannot progress (for the player has to move).
LM_player wrote:
Wait... Why would it be a win for the side that cannot move?
The reason stalemate is a draw is because checkmate has not been delivered (the winning goal). So it is a draw since the game cannot progress (for the player has to move).
The reason stalemate is a draw is because checkmate has not been delivered (the winning goal). So it is a draw since the game cannot progress (for the player has to move).
Like I said - I don't know - that's just the way I see it. Still love you all though.
I don't agree for Blitz/Bullet games, but it is an interesting idea maybe for Rapid/Classical Games
imadarkhorse wrote:
I don't agree for Blitz/Bullet games, but it is an interesting idea maybe for Rapid/Classical Games
Nice input. Thanx!
If you are attacking your opponent but he somehow tricks you into a stalemate, then he should win. Why? I don't know - my perspective - that's it. Love you all.