You're a very disagreeable person.
stalemate is unfair
Sort:
Mar 4, 2020
0
#43
indians who made the chess game used to say satlemate is a win europens took the game and EFEd the rules up
Mar 4, 2020
0
#44
ihammes wrote:
You're a very disagreeable person.
says the person who disagreed with common sense !?
Mar 4, 2020
0
#45
tweetytwo wrote:
blueemu wrote:
In the late 1500s in Spain (and in the 1600s in Russia) stalemate was considered a win for the side that gets stalemated... so you would have LOST that game under the old rules.
hahahhaha thats very funny im sure u see the dumbness and retardness in that one im speaking of old indian rules euro pens made everything so awful it seems
In the old Indian rules, the Queen was the weakest piece, not the strongest. It could only move one square diagonally. Around 1300 AD, these rules were revised... to allow it to jump two squares diagonally on its first move (only).
You don't want to play using the old Indian rules. You just don't want to take responsibility for your own mistakes.
Mar 4, 2020
0
#46
blueemu wrote:
tweetytwo wrote:
blueemu wrote:
In the late 1500s in Spain (and in the 1600s in Russia) stalemate was considered a win for the side that gets stalemated... so you would have LOST that game under the old rules.
hahahhaha thats very funny im sure u see the dumbness and retardness in that one im speaking of old indian rules euro pens made everything so awful it seems
In the old Indian rules, the Queen was the weakest piece, not the strongest. It could only move one square diagonally. Around 1300 AD, these rules were revised... to allow it to jump two squares diagonally on its first move (only).
You don't want to play using the old Indian rules. You just don't want to take responsibility for your own mistakes.
maybe u have hard time tieing connection in ur brain im speaking of fairness its an obvious of fairness aspect this rule is retarded the queen rule is so out the box so unrelated and dont change the skill of both players cause they BOTH have the same queen but the stalemate gives unfairness game result for the one who doesnt deserve it are u that STUPID to tie connection !?!?! where is common sense or do u actually believe it should be a lost that be interesting to see how many dumb ppl exist maybe thats why this rule exist !!! in the first place
If you stalemate a winning position you should be kicked out of CHESS.
"It's not fair" usually just means "I don't like it." You have to checkmate your opponents. If you fail to do so, it isn't the rules' fault.
Mar 4, 2020
0
#49
ihammes wrote:
If you stalemate a winning position you should be kicked out of CHESS.
says the 1100 player grandmasters would agree with me and actually many grand masters disagree with this stupid rule only stupid ppl follow
tweetytwo wrote:
lfPatriotGames wrote:
tweetytwo wrote:
im gonna explain thought its given cause if it werent a stalemate it would been a checkmate there is no other way it just their luck they got stalemated
It's not their luck they got stalemated. It was YOUR move that got them stalemated. You did it, not them. And no, it would not be a checkmate if it weren't a stalemate. How would you NOT stalemating your opponent result in checkmate? Checkmate requires check.
Checkmate and stalemate aren't about how much material someone has or doesn't have. It's about being in check and not being able move, or, not being in check and not being able to move. Regardless of how much material each side has.
Look on the bright side, post 27 and 30 gave us all a laugh. And isn't that the whole point of any game, to have fun?
it is a win till fide changed the rules IM glad ur laughing at lame jokes cause im way smarter to waste my time on jokes and no maybe for u chess is for fun for me is to win and actually some ppl dont deserve to win for ur own information u seem like a d*umb cu*nt ur self
I'm sorry but I cant respond if I dont know what you are saying. Can anyone translate this into English? All I can say is if you dont like the stalemate rule, dont stalemate your opponent. You are the only one who has control over it. Your opponent did not force stalemate, YOU forced it.
Mar 4, 2020
0
#51
lfPatriotGames wrote:
tweetytwo wrote:
lfPatriotGames wrote:
tweetytwo wrote:
im gonna explain thought its given cause if it werent a stalemate it would been a checkmate there is no other way it just their luck they got stalemated
It's not their luck they got stalemated. It was YOUR move that got them stalemated. You did it, not them. And no, it would not be a checkmate if it weren't a stalemate. How would you NOT stalemating your opponent result in checkmate? Checkmate requires check.
Checkmate and stalemate aren't about how much material someone has or doesn't have. It's about being in check and not being able move, or, not being in check and not being able to move. Regardless of how much material each side has.
Look on the bright side, post 27 and 30 gave us all a laugh. And isn't that the whole point of any game, to have fun?
it is a win till fide changed the rules IM glad ur laughing at lame jokes cause im way smarter to waste my time on jokes and no maybe for u chess is for fun for me is to win and actually some ppl dont deserve to win for ur own information u seem like a d*umb cu*nt ur self
I'm sorry but I cant respond if I dont know what you are saying. Can anyone translate this into English? All I can say is if you dont like the stalemate rule, dont stalemate your opponent. You are the only one who has control over it. Your opponent did not force stalemate, YOU forced it.
stalemate rule should be changed so is with ppl who disagree with it if grandmasters agree with me who are you to disagree !!?? also maybe u dont understand my english but do u understand old lady ugly photo old glasses horrible style ugly face stupid Cu*nt
tweety, NOBODY agrees with you...
Mar 4, 2020
0
#53
ihammes wrote:
tweety, NOBODY agrees with you...
Larry Kaufman Grand master and many grand masters do i dont need ur low rated player half brain agreement
I am less than 1200, but I know how to checkmate with a rook and a king.
Every time.
It's easy once you get the hang of it.
The secret is not to get hung up on the rules, and try not to play like a moron.
Mar 4, 2020
0
#55
yeah im sure 1200 under players are happy with stalemate cause ppl like u are the only one that be happy for this cause they cant even win a game so a draw to them is so amazing LOL! fff off loser
Did you ask him to take back the move?
Mar 4, 2020
0
#57
lfPatriotGames wrote:
it is a win till fide changed the rules IM glad ur laughing at lame jokes cause im way smarter to waste my time on jokes and no maybe for u chess is for fun for me is to win and actually some ppl dont deserve to win for ur own information u seem like a d*umb cu*nt ur self
I'm sorry but I cant respond if I dont know what you are saying. Can anyone translate this into English?
I'll have a go...
"It was a win until FIDE changed the rules! I'm glad you're laughing at lame jokes - I am far too intelligent to waste time on humour, despite walking into a stalemate. And NO! Maybe for you chess is fun but I play to win! Some people don't deserve to win, and by the way you seem to be something of a silly-billy"
How's that?!
Mar 4, 2020
0
#58
IpswichMatt wrote:
lfPatriotGames wrote:
it is a win till fide changed the rules IM glad ur laughing at lame jokes cause im way smarter to waste my time on jokes and no maybe for u chess is for fun for me is to win and actually some ppl dont deserve to win for ur own information u seem like a d*umb cu*nt ur self
I'm sorry but I cant respond if I dont know what you are saying. Can anyone translate this into English?
I'll have a go...
"It was a win until FIDE changed the rules! I'm glad you're laughing at lame jokes - I am far too intelligent to waste time on humour, despite walking into a stalemate. And NO! Maybe for you chess is fun but I play to win! Some people don't deserve to win, and by the way you seem to be something of a silly-billy"
How's that?!
Great attempt of translation you should have added you ugly Cu*nt to that
"
its the whole chess system fide stupid rules fault are u too slow to understand !?"
We get one of these crying fits about once a month. They're fun
Mar 4, 2020
0
#60
Laskersnephew wrote:
"
its the whole chess system fide stupid rules fault are u too slow to understand !?"
We get one of these crying fits about once a month. They're fun
so you saying alot of ppl have said it yet u still so stupid to understand ? maybe dumb ppl dont understand intelligence instead u the one crying about it and worshiping that chess rule
In the late 1500s in Spain (and in the 1600s in Russia) stalemate was considered a win for the side that gets stalemated... so you would have LOST that game under the old rules.
hahahhaha thats very funny im sure u see the dumbness and retardness in that one im speaking of old indian rules euro pens made everything so awful it seems