You say grandmasters agree with you? Can you prove that assertion? Also, how is it stupid? It applies equally to both sides, so it is fair. The goal of the game is to checkmate your opponent, not to take their pieces. The material doesn't decide the game. The position does. If you don't like it, then that's just tough. The game doesn't revolve around you or what you think is fair or smart. You keep saying that the stalemate rule is stupid and unfair. Those are not facts. Those are your subjective opinions. In the subjective opinions of the majority of chess players, the stalemate rule is fine. I'm not trying to belittle you, but that's just the way it is. Games are designed to be fun for as many people as possible. If you don't like it, that's fine. You don't have to. However, that doesn't mean you should throw a temper tantrum about it and call everyone else stupid.
stalemate is unfair
"so you saying alot of ppl have said it yet u still so stupid to understand ? "
Well, a lot of stupid people have said it. +1 including you
many ppl will say it and continue saying it and wouldnt knock some sense in ur tiny head and many grand masters did say it maybe thats why ur 1000 K player and maybe u gonna stay like that for too long dumb ppl dont understand obvious things if u cant understand stalemate is illogical u got issues with ur brain cells need to be fixed
Of course people have said it. There's a good reason for having the stalemate rule but I can't be bothered trying to explain it to you.
You say grandmasters agree with you? Can you prove that assertion? Also, how is it stupid? It applies equally to both sides, so it is fair. The goal of the game is to checkmate your opponent, not to take their pieces. The material doesn't decide the game. The position does. If you don't like it, then that's just tough. The game doesn't revolve around you or what you think is fair or smart. You keep saying that the stalemate rule is stupid and unfair. Those are not facts. Those are your subjective opinions. In the subjective opinions of the majority of chess players, the stalemate rule is fine. I'm not trying to belittle you, but that's just the way it is. Games are designed to be fun for as many people as possible. If you don't like it, that's fine. You don't have to. However, that doesn't mean you should throw a temper tantrum about it and call everyone else stupid.
go check Grandmaster Larry Kaufman
Of course people have said it. There's a good reason for having the stalemate rule but I can't be bothered trying to explain it to you.
yeah because u dont have a good reason ! u not bothered yet u replying to this HA what a JOKe u are
That's one grandmaster. One. Are there any others?
im sure many agree with him im not here to educate you the point is made this grandmaster agrees with me who are you to disagree im sure other grandmasters do to only low rated players be happy to draw cause u never win with dignity
Of course people have said it. There's a good reason for having the stalemate rule but I can't be bothered trying to explain it to you.
yeah because u dont have a good reason ! u not bothered yet u replying to this HA what a JOKe u are
Google it mate. Google is your friend.
Possibly your only friend
stalemate with one opponent having materials and the other no materials is illogical if i have to explain to you why its a win you got issue with critical thinking
Google Translate seems to have encountered a serious bug
"many ppl will say it and continue saying it and wouldnt knock some sense in ur tiny head and many grand masters did say it maybe thats why ur 1000 K player and maybe u gonna stay like that for too long dumb ppl dont understand obvious things if u cant understand stalemate is illogical u got issues with ur brain cells need to be fixed"
Of course people have said it. There's a good reason for having the stalemate rule but I can't be bothered trying to explain it to you.
yeah because u dont have a good reason ! u not bothered yet u replying to this HA what a JOKe u are
Google it mate. Google is your friend.
Possibly your only friend
im not gonna waste more time on u maybe go watch more episodes of the simpsons something that fits your brain capability
Google Translate seems to have encountered a serious bug
"many ppl will say it and continue saying it and wouldnt knock some sense in ur tiny head and many grand masters did say it maybe thats why ur 1000 K player and maybe u gonna stay like that for too long dumb ppl dont understand obvious things if u cant understand stalemate is illogical u got issues with ur brain cells need to be fixed"
seems like u love trolling it fits ur low rated 1k u wouldnt exceed 1200 any time soon im sure
You know you can create your own variant of chess which is just like normal chess but without stalemate right?
Then you and all the other people who get upset after throwing away a win can stop polluting the forums with this bollox.
"seems like u love trolling it fits ur low rated 1k u wouldnt exceed 1200 any time soon im sure"
Why so sad and angry, son? Relax, have fun. I'm sure you're actually a bright and pleasant young man in real life, why not be one here?
i dont know how old you are Ipswichmatt i hope you be old enough to wittness illogical stalemate thingy in chess changed im sure it will change with time as many higher rated ppl agree with me also GMs maybe then u could play with lower rated players with that rule
"seems like u love trolling it fits ur low rated 1k u wouldnt exceed 1200 any time soon im sure"
Why so sad and angry, son? Relax, have fun. I'm sure you're actually a bright and pleasant young man in real life, why not be one here?
well in real life i would ignore u cause u too dumb for me but here im giving u a chance so i would say im less bitter here
I think we'll have to agree to disagree here. I think stalemate introduces a wonderful, almost magical element to chess. It allows for almost miraculous saves and makes the winning side use precision and care to bring the win home. And be honest with yourself, wasn't it just foolish and careless play that robbed you of your win? You knew the rules.
im have to repeat my self here you could say careless if it was a rapid game but since its a blitz game there is nothing more worse than losing in time than losing to a stalemate that should been a win this stalemate just profit the loser side one being a bad player and continue playing without resigning with no dignity shouldnt be a draw
"so you saying alot of ppl have said it yet u still so stupid to understand ? "
Well, a lot of stupid people have said it. +1 including you