Stalemate means a player is stuck and can't move but is not in check. Because the king can't move, the king offers a draw to the enemy and somehow it is classified as a draw. So stalemate is just an unconditional draw.
yeah no s*it captain obvious. we all know. even 5 year olds know that
Bro needs to argue with someone because I'm saying how stupid stalemate is. Bro is just rage-baiting
Stalemate means a player is stuck and can't move but is not in check. Because the king can't move, the king offers a draw to the enemy and somehow it is classified as a draw. So stalemate is just an unconditional draw.
yeah no s*it captain obvious. we all know. even 5 year olds know that
Bro needs to argue with someone because I'm saying how stupid stalemate is. Bro is just rage-baiting
As stupid as the rule is, it's necessary. Before stalemate, either the guy who got stale mated won, or the person who stalemated. So, it wouldn't be fair.
The King doesn't 'offer a draw'.
The King smugly smiles and says 'you blew it Guy. I've got no moves but I'm not in Check. So we're Equal and the game's Over.
See ya next time. Later Dude.'
The King doesn't 'offer a draw'.
The King smugly smiles and says 'you blew it Guy. I've got no moves but I'm not in Check. So we're Equal and the game's Over.
See ya next time. Later Dude.'
Bro the enemy ain't blind he can keep advancing to his place or accept it. In this case this is an unconditional draw
Sanjay I don't see the rule as stupid.
If the attacker wants to run his opponent out of moves he's got to make sure that other King is in check when that happens.
Otherwise its a bounced Money Order.
No pay.
I didn't say it was stupid. the other guy did. So, I told him. It was accidentally added
The King doesn't 'offer a draw'.
The King smugly smiles and says 'you blew it Guy. I've got no moves but I'm not in Check. So we're Equal and the game's Over.
See ya next time. Later Dude.'
Bro the enemy ain't blind he can keep advancing to his place or accept it. In this case this is an unconditional draw
No he can't Bro.
He can't 'keep advancing' anywhere.
Game's over Dude.
Surf's not up.
Its over Bro. To the Max.
Next time Dude.
#51 This thing will only happen with kings who are dumb enough to consider the war a draw. I have seen countless battles where the king is trapped or encircled with nowhere to run or hide, they would either surrender which considers the war a win for the other side.
#51 This thing will only happen with kings who are dumb enough to consider the war a draw. I have seen countless battles where the king is trapped or encircled with nowhere to run or hide, they would either surrender which considers the war a win for the other side.
This is chess. not war
#51 This thing will only happen with kings who are dumb enough to consider the war a draw. I have seen countless battles where the king is trapped or encircled with nowhere to run or hide, they would either surrender which considers the war a win for the other side.
This is chess. not war
"Chess was inspired from wars."
#51 This thing will only happen with kings who are dumb enough to consider the war a draw. I have seen countless battles where the king is trapped or encircled with nowhere to run or hide, they would either surrender which considers the war a win for the other side.
This is chess. not war
"Chess was inspired from wars."
There's a difference.
In real wars, it's not like you have to wait for the other guy's turn.
In chess, you have to wait for them to move a piece, pawn or king. If there's no legal moves but king's not in check, it's stalemate. as you can't move twice. you have to wait for the other guy.
In wars, you don't have to do that
#51 This thing will only happen with kings who are dumb enough to consider the war a draw. I have seen countless battles where the king is trapped or encircled with nowhere to run or hide, they would either surrender which considers the war a win for the other side.
This is chess. not war
"Chess was inspired from wars."
don't make dumb arguments
#51 This thing will only happen with kings who are dumb enough to consider the war a draw. I have seen countless battles where the king is trapped or encircled with nowhere to run or hide, they would either surrender which considers the war a win for the other side.
This is chess. not war
"Chess was inspired from wars."
don't make dumb arguments
Chess is inspired by war bro, its just a strategy game.
Waiting for turns isn't a major difference of the game. Its a strategy game. And when it is a strategy game one side will see what they do and think about their next move. It totally makes sense and someone will 3 braincells would know this.
#51 This thing will only happen with kings who are dumb enough to consider the war a draw. I have seen countless battles where the king is trapped or encircled with nowhere to run or hide, they would either surrender which considers the war a win for the other side.
This is chess. not war
"Chess was inspired from wars."
Doesn't matter. Its a game not war.
#51 This thing will only happen with kings who are dumb enough to consider the war a draw. I have seen countless battles where the king is trapped or encircled with nowhere to run or hide, they would either surrender which considers the war a win for the other side.
This is chess. not war
"Chess was inspired from wars."
don't make dumb arguments
Chess is inspired by war bro, its just a strategy game.
Waiting for turns isn't a major difference of the game. Its a strategy game. And when it is a strategy game one side will see what they do and think about their next move. It totally makes sense and someone will 3 braincells would know this.
Your saying someone with 3 braincells can do it because you have 1
#51 This thing will only happen with kings who are dumb enough to consider the war a draw. I have seen countless battles where the king is trapped or encircled with nowhere to run or hide, they would either surrender which considers the war a win for the other side.
This is chess. not war
"Chess was inspired from wars."
don't make dumb arguments
Chess is inspired by war bro, its just a strategy game.
Waiting for turns isn't a major difference of the game. Its a strategy game. And when it is a strategy game one side will see what they do and think about their next move. It totally makes sense and someone will 3 braincells would know this.
Read the other comment too.
VCY
good luck trying to maintain the King can still move after stalemate.
And pun intended ...
Peace out.
Sanjay - good luck trying to reason with VCY.
And I like that Gupta guy on TV. The health stuff.
Later.
#51 This thing will only happen with kings who are dumb enough to consider the war a draw. I have seen countless battles where the king is trapped or encircled with nowhere to run or hide, they would either surrender which considers the war a win for the other side.
This is chess. not war
"Chess was inspired from wars."
don't make dumb arguments
Chess is inspired by war bro, its just a strategy game.
Waiting for turns isn't a major difference of the game. Its a strategy game. And when it is a strategy game one side will see what they do and think about their next move. It totally makes sense and someone will 3 braincells would know this.
Your saying someone with 3 braincells can do it because you have 1
is this discussion degraded from why stalemate is a stupid rule to some insults that only an immature kid would do? I think the rule is stupid, what are you going to do?
Stalemate means a player is stuck and can't move but is not in check. Because the king can't move, the king offers a draw to the enemy and somehow it is classified as a draw. So stalemate is just an unconditional draw.
yeah no s*it captain obvious. we all know. even 5 year olds know that