weir96 wrote:
Zhane wrote:
Also I agree with that Erik is the true sheriff of chess.com Who's with me ? i definitely second that
me too. Erik, dont suspend cheater_1, hes good entertainment.
STICK TO THE TOPIC!!!!
Sort:
Aug 31, 2008
0
#23
Let me make one thing PEFECTLY clear. I am in NO DANGER of being suspended or deleted. There is simply NO CHANCE. Of course, even Sheriffs have to play by the rules.
I am NEEDED by this site. My services (too many to list) are valuable. True, this site would exist without me, but so would the EARTH if the moon crashed into it, it's just that it's a better place with me around. I'm trying to help you all, save you from yourselves, eliminate the riff-raff and keep THIS SITE ON TOPIC. I love chess more than 99% people and I have taken up the cause of DEFENDING chess from all the slimeballs here. I WILL NOT ALLOW PEOPLE to drag chess through the mud. NOT ON MY WATCH.
I now realize that I will NEVER play another vote chess game here (the cowards have won), so I have taken it upon myself to be the self appointed enforcer of all that is GOOD and TRUE.
No, you will NEVER EVER EVER see a STAFF icon behind my name. I'm not on the company payroll. My services are FREE. It's the least I can do.
This reminds me of The Wizard of Oz.
"The Great and Powerful Oz."
The man behind the curtain.
All Hail.
The Topic is and will always be you know who.
It doesn't take much to entertain us.
Did someone mention gas prices??
Hey dude.
I bet I'm the toughest guy on the block. After I get moved to my new house I'm thinking of challenging chess.com while playing a rematch with you.
Off topic. I recently got my hands on the 2.2 version of Rybka. It is as tactical as they say. It can be beaten with Capablanca like positional play. You can't hand it it's hat with a morphy like attack, It still has computer strength attack detection. The style of the author of its code comes through nicely. I suspect the opening book for it favours opening the position any way it can. I didn't download the OB yet. Anyone who knows the openings well enough can have a strick enough control to handle the machine. It does not fair any better in closed positions than other top engines. In October I'm going to play a series of games against it and publish my findings here. (I do this using tournament mode and the players besides myself are the usual suspects, Fritz et al.)
He won't drag chess through the mud, just the forums.
I heard the same story but im positive it was a 13 story midget? 
Sep 1, 2008
0
#30
I agree, gas price as rose pretty insanely those days. We'll have to do somthing about this.
the only (pointful(chess sport)) thing you have ever said that is right
Lilith wrote:
Eat more eggs. If you don`t like eggs, unlucky. Moron = Man/Woman with no egg ingestion. Over 99% of chess.com members do not eat eggs. Surprised? Look in the mirror and ask yourselves, do I eat enough eggs?
Chessroshi wrote:
He won't drag chess through the mud, just the forums.
Or mud through the chess forums.
I can't figure cheater_1 out. The first stuff of his I read made me sure he was a teen or pre-teen. Then I read more of his stuff. He says he's in his early 40s, but of course he's a cheat, so . . .
He doesn't seem to play on this website, though.
He certainly appears to be one unhappy and angry dude. Maybe he feels stuck in a little, remote town like Midwest, Wyoming. (I dunno. Seems to me like my kind of town.)
As I said before, I always respond to posts that merit a response. Seeing this topic is all about sticking to the topic, I anticipated EVERYONE not sticking to the topic. No one was even supposed to post here, it was just an observation by me.
I call it like I see it. Now, if I were to talk about a chess issue, then I would DEMAND that the topic be stuck to. Do you all see where I'm coming from?