Since many here think I am weak and not worhty of writing good books,
above is a position from one of my games against Stockfish played on talkchess
forum in late 2014.
TC was 30 minutes per game, so close to analytical.
How many people will find the move with which I won against Stockfish?
It is obvious that ALPHA ZERO blind Stockfish
No news from Alpha for a veeeery looong time.
Have they given up.
Latest SF bashing them?
NO ONE CAN BEAT ALPHA ZERO MAN
Come on, we already discussed that - it RAN on 100 times stronger hardware and the training hardware costed 10 000 times more than SF hardware or so.
Alpha plays at 2300-2400, so any entity, mechanical or even better human playing stronger than that will certainly beat it.
The perfect player will come at 6000 elos or so so a lot of leeway for improvement and thrashing suboptimal engines.
Lyudmil, you don't know that. All anyone knows is that it has played as the best engine int he world, and would almost inevitably play slower on a regular computer. But you can't demote the best engine in the world to play at a measly 2300 when even Deep Blue could do better than that in 1996. You have absolutely NO evidence that it would play that low, you're just making stuff up for a reason I can not see
You lack BASIC computing knowledge - 4 TPUS(the hardware Alpha used) are roughly equivalent to 2000+ standard processing units, even not taking into account ALL other accompanying factors that strongly disfavoured SF.
Â
Â
You are right in saying I have no knowledge of all that computer stuff. I am just some amateur programmer in HTML, CSS, and Java. You are still wrong though in saying that AlphaZero plays at 2300 on a normal computer. I know that a normal computer today has much more processing power than the best computer in 1996. So:
Better chess engine than Deep Blue + Better computer than Deep Blue = Better rating than Deep Blue.
I don't know what rating Deep Blue was, but it was WELL over 2300, so AlphaZero COULDNT play NEAR 2300.
Yes, I don't have much computer knowledge, but you don't have much common sense, and that's where your argument is flawed
good point... as this thread is going nowhere MODS PLEASE DELETE THREAD
Lyudmil, for you to say that you can beat Stockfish is for you to say that you are the best chess entity in the world, and when you give microscopic proof of this claim, you are simply just making a fool of yourself
OK, I will retranslate my claim: I have played the MOST chess games against SF of any man living.
Sounds better?
Thank you for saying probably the easiest claim to prove wrong. You don't know who is the 2nd most, and there is no record book for most games. I might be mistaken, and there is a leaderboard for this, but I highly doubt it. If you have no proof, then man, you are not even TRYING to convince anyone that you're right anymore, you're just spitting stuff out of your mouth