Stockfish is WRONG, HE SUCKS

Sort:
BronsteinPawn

I know Stockfish is free, but I am really dissapointed at him.

Appart from overevaluating positions when he is supposedly calculating at 20 ply just to change his evaluation drastically after I make a move on the GUI he sucks at endgames.

Like look at this position, Stockfish is stupid enough to give only a 0.

 
For once I dont think that is a 0.00 at all, I would shout "BLACK MAGIC" if somehow White could drew that thing.
So, is there any engine that actually knows about endgames? If Stockfish cant really evaluate an endgame then he cant analyze anything.
Should I buy Komodo? Does the lizard know about endgames?
Thanks.
EscherehcsE
[COMMENT DELETED]
Bilbo21

Stockfish beat all the other engines by a mile at the last big tournament.  She is usually the best 

BronsteinPawn

So are you telling me that position is actually a 0.00, I cant' simply believe that, White is askign for a big juicy squeeze in that position.

EscherehcsE
[COMMENT DELETED]
BronsteinPawn

That is actually fro ma correspondence game I had here on chess.com, I was trying my brand new Sveshnikov and the dud humbilified me with his Alapin thing. 

After I got this position on board I knew I was gonna win, like just see it, it is beatiful to play such positions when you can squeeze and your opponent cant do anything.

OseanVega

Well, it's true that Stockfish says it's 0.00, which is weird.

Black's position does look quite good, but maybe I am missing something.

BronsteinPawn

What the hell is an ARB?
I was gonna post this to brag about my sweet endgame technique with something like "ENJOY MY HUMBLE ENDGAME TECHINQUE" or "WHY WAS THIS ENDGAME SO GOOD" but remember I was supposed to be humble and couldnt brag so I went for this type of thread, Clickbaitish, but true to the title and with a chess game, so it stays on the general chess discussion topic, because not only am I talking about the game (which would send it to endgmae topic or something like that) but I am also talking about Stockfish's fake evaluation.

NOW THAT IS HOW A TROLLERFUL MIND WORKS FOR YOU, OH YEAH BABY.

Elite_Shadow101
Stockfish is better
Elite_Shadow101
Stock fish is a master piece
BronsteinPawn

Not really, Stockfish has flaws as any other engine, however I dont think Im quite at the level to detect it grin.png.

I still dont buy the 0.00 evaluation.

EscherehcsE
[COMMENT DELETED]
BronsteinPawn

I didnt. But you did.

That just goes to proves humans are still superior than engines, HELL YEAH BABY.

slowdeath22

Either this is a case of where a human has schematic thinking and an engine does not, or Stockfish has miraculously found a way to defend the c3 pawn or get enough counter-play for a draw. But seeing as how his assessment is steadily increasing in black's favour, I assume the former.

BronsteinPawn

Can you show it? I dont think White has counterplay at all.

eaguiraud

If you run the game "Short vs Timman" 1991 Stockfish won't find the king walk (at least it was like that last time I checked)

Namelecc

I love the title of this blog...."

Stockfish is WRONG, HE SUCKS

 


 

 

DONT ASSUME STOCKFISH'S GENDER!!!!!

Namelecc

#Troll

blitzcopter

Have you looked at the likely lines suggested by Stockfish after 19. Bc2?

4xel

Why not have stockfish prove it to you? Try to win as black against her in this position.