17126 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Lots of computer chess programs can easily compete at and above world class level.
Lately I have been playing against Chessmaster set a level thats not too far above me, but still at a point where i can't win a game. I want to know if it would be more beneficial for learning to play the computer at its hardest, world class level. The idea is that I would constantly see and learn superior moves, but would i really get it if the computer is annihalating me instantly?
What are your thoughts? How far above my own level should I play at?
Try playing a level where you score about 40%, and as you get better raise the level accordingly.
Enough success to keep your nose in the game.
I would likely bump it down a level, to where you win SOMEtimes, but not every game. once you get to where you are winning more than half bump it back up. i love CM for that purpose. :)
Playing computers is depressing. I gave up over 15 years ago.
play at a level that you can compete at without being thrashed but u cant beat a human player.....lol
Playing vs. a computer is a little inefficient in terms of trying to improve except
i) When you are practicing won or holding "drawn" games (technique).
ii) When you are gauging/training your ability to play tactically safe chess. (if you miss something, you can be sure the engine will find it)
Humans (at the higher skill levels) bring in the element of psychology into the game and make moves based out of risk assessment/management. A computer will try to play the best move it can find ... a human can try to take you into complications/traps that you will have to struggle to find "only one way out" type solutions in a time-limited manner. Additionally, a human can actually "play the man" and not just the board if the situation warrants it.
i enjoy playing against human players also as i find they test me more than a computer does because u dont know wot random piece will be moved yet
"2016 NORWAY CHESS RECAP! with GM Hansen and GM Sokolov!"
worst pun contest
by learningthemoves a few minutes ago
Chess celebrations when to fist pump
by Jimmy720 a few minutes ago
SCID vs PC
by Martin_Stahl a few minutes ago
Signed tour. brochure from 1958 by Bobby Fischer & other chess masters
by stuzzicadenti 4 minutes ago
Fischer vs. Kasparov
by troy7915 6 minutes ago
4/29/2016 - Bird's Opening, From's Gambit Analysis
by Konig6 8 minutes ago
Learning from books vs on line lessons, is one better than the other?
by thegreat_patzer 9 minutes ago
4/30/2016 - Caught In A Web
by aalv 15 minutes ago
Why does blocking do so little?
by Miachel99 18 minutes ago
Did I blunder this endgame?
by jengaias 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!