On line coaches are mostly for people that have no time or are too lazy to study by themselves.A good study program can offer you most of the knowledge you need and way faster.Even if after that you would need a coach , you would need only the best and who is the best?People that have created titled players and these people usually are teaching in chess clubs and not on line.Sorry if I dissapoint you but I don't believe any good player ever relied on an on-line coach , can you show me one?
Most incorrect statement possible. Many master and expert level players learn from IMs/GMs online.
@ Jengaias.
so this is not about NOT studying.
I don't agree that you need the BEST player to be a coach. you need a coach you have faith in, one you understand, and one who has a proven record of strong understanding of chess. then again at 4x I'm not going to ever be a gm , so I Don't need a gm. my coach is a strong player with a proven rating from the phillipines. I like him, he likes me, and I have gotten instructive things from his lessons...
the last thought is just Silly. ALL of the top 10 players have coaches - and sometimes getting a new one has made real improvement in a player.
IN FACT, top 10 players often have coaches that are have less rating than them. as you know Rating Isn't knowledge and many top gm coaches are lifetime students of the game.
of course you retort these are "real coaches" and not online. ok. fine. I agree OTB coaches are better. OTB chess is better!!
but not everyone can find a OTB coach. you probably can't become a world class player, playing chess sites and and online coach.
but you can get better at chess doing both. espacially if otb competition is too far to drive (which by the way MIGHT be a big problem for a 16year old kid)