Hi to chess , com ...an opponent had 3 pawns a knight and a king And when his time ran out you call it a draw? I had only king...….un believeable
He ran out of time. You had only a king.
Lucky you.
/ Do you play out king versus king over the board? Why not?
Given the time, Black should win easily. As White, I would be thanking my lucky stars. Successful chess playing in this instance meant managing both time and pieces well . . . Not a stupid rule, just part of the game.
Great rule. Awesome rule. Best rule ever.
He earned a draw by getting all your pieces. You did not earn a win.
my point his he ran out of time he lost I was saved by time ...I win he had all material to win ...no?
No. Just no . . .
anyway I respect the rule thanks...on the other hand if you ran out of time you lose...ok ok
lets say he had chance to win 'if he had time'
just talking no problems
anyway I respect the rule thanks...on the other hand if you ran out of time you lose...ok ok
The game of chess existed for centuries before the clock was introduced. The idea of winning a chess game with a lone king on the board would have been considered ridiculous. So when time controls were introduced it made perfect sense for the rules to evolve as they have. If you want to win on time you had better have enough mating material left on the board.
Hi to chess , com ...an opponent had 3 pawns a knight and a king And when his time ran out you call it a draw? I had only king...….un believeable