Summer Chess

Sort:
Avatar of ostrich321

It is very clear to me that the school year is now over. This leaves an interesting question for me and any student on chess.com, how to play chess over the summer. I want to remain active and keep my chess skills up, but I also want chess games that can fit in my schedule so I don't lose a lot via timeouts. Any suggestions?

Avatar of Puchiko

Well, live chess games sound reasonable.

If you want to stick to on-line, just go for longer time controls (as much as 14 days/move is possible).

Have you also looked into OTB chess? I'm planning to play an OTB tourney with slow time controls this summer (9 games at G/90 + 30s/move-I'm so excited), as well as attend a chess summer camp. I'll also continue visiting the chess club twice per week. Looking for such opportunities near you could help you improve greatly.

Avatar of ostrich321

Maybe I'll play live chess instead of longer online games. Good point about winter though.

Avatar of ostrich321

Sometimes it's easy to forget how big this world really is.

Avatar of ostrich321

Reaching the speed of light is possible in accordance with Einstein's theory of relativity (with lots of energy), exceeding the speed of light is impossible. 

 

Also, a second is the time it takes for Earth to travel about 2/857 of its diameter through space (Earth travels at about 18.5 miles/second through space).

Avatar of thegreatarch

What you should do is have longer time limits. If you had 3 days in the fall, try 4-5 days instead. Remember to use your vacation days also.

Avatar of oinquarki
ostrich321 wrote:

It is very clear to me that the school year is now over. This leaves an interesting question for me and any student on chess.com, how to play chess over the summer. I want to remain active and keep my chess skills up, but I also want chess games that can fit in my schedule so I don't lose a lot via timeouts. Any suggestions?


 Just longer correspondence games, I guess. Also you can try to find some over the board clubs or tourneys in your area.

BorgQueen wrote:

It's also nowhere near the speeds mentioned!

I thought Einstein proved that it was impossible to even match C because the closer you get to C, the slower time goes.  If you ever reached C time would stop, which prevents the usage of energy, which means you can never reach C.


 Borg right. Panda wrong. Discussion over.

Avatar of ostrich321

I usually play games in excess of 7 days time limits. So what do I do when my family and I go on extended vacations?

Avatar of smileative

i hopes u has a happy holiday Smile that's what vacations is for Smile

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet
BorgQueen wrote:

1.  The school year is not over.

2.  It is winter.

Welcome to the Internet ;-)


 How IS the weather where you are now? It's hotter than hell where I am.

Avatar of Conflagration_Planet
ostrich321 wrote:

Reaching the speed of light is possible in accordance with Einstein's theory of relativity (with lots of energy), exceeding the speed of light is impossible. 

 

Also, a second is the time it takes for Earth to travel about 2/857 of its diameter through space (Earth travels at about 18.5 miles/second through space).


 No, it is not! According to the theory, it would take an infinite amount of energy to reach the speed of light, and the moving object would become infinitely massive. Impossible. You can move an object as close to the speed of light as you want, but try as you might, you will never reach it. Unless of course, it's  massless like a photon. Just think. If you could move at light speed, there would be no time passage. You would have no future, and know no past.

Avatar of ivandh
BorgQueen wrote:
woodshover wrote:
ostrich321 wrote:

Reaching the speed of light is possible in accordance with Einstein's theory of relativity (with lots of energy), exceeding the speed of light is impossible.

 

Also, a second is the time it takes for Earth to travel about 2/857 of its diameter through space (Earth travels at about 18.5 miles/second through space).


No, it is not! According to the theory, it would take an infinite amount of energy to reach the speed of light, and the moving object would become infinitely massive. Impossible. You can move an object as close to the speed of light as you want, but try as you might, you will never reach it. Unless of course, it's massless like a photon. Just think. If you could move at light speed, there would be no time passage. You would have no future, and know no past.


Yes, that's the way I understood it. One thing I never got though was that if this were all true, that time would stop, and all these infinites with mass and energy... all very absolute things... why isn't the speed of light infinite!?


The point is that they aren't absolute, that is why its called the theory of relativity. They only seem absolute in "normal" conditions, when we're not traveling near the speed of light or sitting next to a black hole.

Avatar of ostrich321

If it's impossible to reach the speed of light, would you just say that a light beam travels at 99.99% of its speed?

Avatar of ostrich321

Correct. Conventional physics break down the nearer a physical object, not a light beam, reaches the speed of light. Therefore, the speed of light is a lot like absolute zero (0ºK) in that it is possible to get very close to it, but so far, impossible to actually achieve.

Avatar of ostrich321

Its impossible for mass to reach the speed of light for an object with mass, but it is possible for energy to reach the speed of light. It has also been discovered that information can travel faster than the speed of light, which makes time travel for subatomic particles possible.