Yup
the best chess player in the world, and no body knows it.. only magnus Carlsen

Anish is a strong player, no doubt. He can pick apart lower-rated players with ease.
But the reason he draws so much, at the elite level, is because he often shies away from risks and complications, choosing the less risky (more stodgy) lines in many cases.
It's kind of a trade-off. It makes you more solid as a defender, and less likely to lose. But it also makes you less threatening as an attacker, and less likely to win.

That is a great idea! Very curious how long it would be to program a bot to learn to draw in virtually any position. If there is a place to vote for this suggestion, please let me know, I'd like to support your idea too.

cause if black cannot draw against white, or if computers got so strong that black is no longer able to draw against white then that means, chess is solve

no computer or human can draw in any position. Anish is far from being the best player in the world.

no computer or human can draw in any position. Anish is far from being the best player in the world.
anish giri is a god at drawing games.. because someone always draw games and never lost, makes them not best player?

Who told you he never lost?
only reason why he lost games is because he didn't make draws all the time, but if he wanted to, he could off
The only reason I'm not World Champion is because I don't want to, if I wanted to, I could off easily won Candidates and then beaten Magnus.

anish giri is the best chess player in the world, my reason for this is, when ever he wants a draw, he makes a draw, if he plays against the world champion when he is about to lose, even in a mate in 6, Anish giri wonderous GENIUS and tactical superiority can make a draw in a forced checkmate position, no engine can do that, Anish giri is like the magnus Carlsen of draws, he wins games to, but if a draw must happen in order to win as black, i would vote for Anish giri, as he is the only gm i would bet on, when it comes to winning an event by making draws. we need engines like alpha zero to only be able to make draws.. Chess.com this idea will be genius, as if Anish alpha zero draws against alpha zero, that means Anish ALpha zero is the best computer engine ever, 4450 rating vs a 4460 that knows to draw in any position. we need this bot in chess. this might be able to solve chess once and for all.
as good as it is to draw, i think its better when you win bro

hes like the cristiano ronaldo of football, tom brady of stupid football, tiger woods of golf, roger federer of tennis, sachin tendulkar of cricket, mozart at piano, da vinci at general nerdiness, etc.

Anish is a strong player, no doubt. He can pick apart lower-rated players with ease.
But the reason he draws so much, at the elite level, is because he often shies away from risks and complications, choosing the less risky (more stodgy) lines in many cases.
It's kind of a trade-off. It makes you more solid as a defender, and less likely to lose. But it also makes you less threatening as an attacker, and less likely to win.
+1
anish giri is the best chess player in the world, my reason for this is, when ever he wants a draw, he makes a draw, if he plays against the world champion when he is about to lose, even in a mate in 6, Anish giri wonderous GENIUS and tactical superiority can make a draw in a forced checkmate position, no engine can do that, Anish giri is like the magnus Carlsen of draws, he wins games to, but if a draw must happen in order to win as black, i would vote for Anish giri, as he is the only gm i would bet on, when it comes to winning an event by making draws. we need engines like alpha zero to only be able to make draws.. Chess.com this idea will be genius, as if Anish alpha zero draws against alpha zero, that means Anish ALpha zero is the best computer engine ever, 4450 rating vs a 4460 that knows to draw in any position. we need this bot in chess. this might be able to solve chess once and for all.