eh whatever it's getting boring
The majority of Chess.com's puzzles are SO stupid!
Sort:
Nov 17, 2024
0
#85
dasan_c wrote:
The solution the computer wants to this 1450 puzzle is to sacrifice your Queen, instead of taking with the Knight. Insanity. Maybe chess.com puzzle algo/generation needs some human Q&A??
thats because if you take the queen then it's stalemate .
Lailaiking2 wrote:
dasan_c wrote:
The solution the computer wants to this 1450 puzzle is to sacrifice your Queen, instead of taking with the Knight. Insanity. Maybe chess.com puzzle algo/generation needs some human Q&A??
thats because if you take the queen then it's stalemate .
A lot of people have already answered the guy. 2 and a half years ago.
i have not seen any of chess.com puzzles but i agree, they are probably stupid
dasan_c wrote:
The solution the computer wants to this 1450 puzzle is to sacrifice your Queen, instead of taking with the Knight. Insanity. Maybe chess.com puzzle algo/generation needs some human Q&A??
Yeah now i see how dumb it is. Qf5 saccing the queen would lose on the spot.
I think around 3200-3300 it starts getting a bit weird. More calculation and evaluation with very little tactics.
Personally, untill 3000, like 90% of the puzzles are ok.
Nov 18, 2024
0
#90
Wasn't there a puzzle where the entire gimmick was that you had to stop the 50-move rule from taking effect? That is dumb.
Nov 18, 2024
0
#91
With a puzzle rating of 6893, I have authority to state that puzzles are fine, any puzzle can happen in a real game, since after 3 moves you hvae 121 millions possible moves. So everysequence is technically possible.
you edited your message but it only makes a little more sense