Endgame...never has anything that can look so simple be so complicated.
The most interesting part of a chess?
Sort:
Stress Reliever
The sheer enjoyment I get out of it.
Diakonia wrote:
Endgame...never has anything that can look so simple be so complicated.
Yeah! A lot of creativity is required before reaching the technical phase. My personal favorite player, Capablanca, was a master in playing the so-called non-technical endgame. Sadly, he got outplayed by Alekhine in technical endgames!
chessman1504 wrote:
Diakonia wrote:
Endgame...never has anything that can look so simple be so complicated.
Yeah! A lot of creativity is required before reaching the technical phase. My personal favorite player, Capablanca, was a master in playing the so-called non-technical endgame. Sadly, he got outplayed by Alekhine in technical endgames!
Gotta agree with you.
Going over and studying Capa's and Rubensteins endgames are a marvel to be held.
Endgame study.
small talk
A wild position that has tactical threats galore.
alex-rodriguez wrote:
chessman1504 wrote:
Hello,
I wanted some opinions on what the most interesting thing in chess is to you. I, for one, prefer a well-played and subtle endgame. It reinvigorates the game for me.
chessman
What you wrote - I agree. I especially like endgames when I have 2 bishops and my opponent has 1 bishop & 1 knight, and that's my only advantage. I like being able to squeeze a win out of that endgame.
Intriguing, though such a combination need not be an advantage :)
Hello,
I wanted some opinions on what the most interesting thing in chess is to you. I, for one, prefer a well-played and subtle endgame. It reinvigorates the game for me.
chessman