I'm confused...
But I've also been Curious to see a Match between two of the best engines going at it. How it would pan out neither blundering
Sure It exists
Never thougt about asking till I saw this thread
And not wanting to derail
Unsure what you're asking though
I think this is at least partially, poetic.
"very pretty" is the correct response. on the other hand, who hasn't wished they could truly unravel ches and become unstoppable and undefeatable at the game.
having taken a potshot at Carlsen's game tonight. I kind of wish I were a bit, no a lot stronger. but... I think you can only try to do your best and take whatever results the royal game gives you.
and if it were a question, yes, if you never made a mistake you would not lose.... irregardless of the "color of pieces, or name,or ranking"
see I'm just full of advice tonight! lol.
I'm confused...
But I've also been Curious to see a Match between two of the best engines going at it. How it would pan out neither blundering
Sure It exists
Never thougt about asking till I saw this thread
i hear ya; what a game that would be...flawless moves all the way through...i wonder about that too...would it therefore be stalemate, or would such a game expose the theory as likely that white pieces moving first provides inherent advantage, or what? I was asking how to find the Truth, how we can know anything with absolute certitude, how we can acquire omniscience even if we choose to use it to remove it, for it seems to me that chess can't be mastered, except perhaps by God or something like that, but that no matter how long chess is around as an obstacle to overcome or a mountain to climb, it is intimately entangled with humanity, and people will keep getting smarter and smarter enhancing the game therefore, it will dance through evolution along with us, through change, though for all we know the greatest chess player of all time, future included, may have already passed away, in a cave, in a jungle where cicadas gather every thirteen years and fill the sky with beautiful din, but that is fairly unlikely if you ask me cuz the future is precisely as deep, as long, as eternal, as the past, and life, as jeff goldloom reminded us in jurassic park, finds a way.
------
I think this is at least partially, poetic.
"very pretty" is the correct response. on the other hand, who hasn't wished they could truly unravel ches and become unstoppable and undefeatable at the game.
having taken a potshot at Carlsen's game tonight. I kind of wish I were a bit, no a lot stronger. but... I think you can only try to do your best and take whatever results the royal game gives you.
and if it were a question, yes, if you never made a mistake you would not lose.... irregardless of the "color of pieces, or name,or ranking"
see I'm just full of advice tonight! lol.------
i hear ya! its pretty wild stuff. the poem may as well have the song The Impossible Dream (<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cGsYrpejAYw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> ) playing in the background when read.
Course, as far as stars go, the unreachable one's the one to reach for, or so heart whispers...through a trumpet...through a megaphone. if one can master chess, they will literally be in the presence of all truth. they will know everything, and that, quite simply, is because it would require omniscience to do so...or so that particular theory goes, that voice in the deep abyss suppose...s.
additionally i was trying to get people pumped up to ask that question for themselves, so as to better their games, for in so reaching for infinity, you are bound to at least land among the stars, and playing people who can crush you like an impiscruvial worm is wise and beneficial at a magnitude far exceeding the benefits of seeking out much lower ranked players to toy with, when the reason to play them should instead be to help them better their games too. the poem is like an onion, which is like an ogre, which is like a cake, which is like life, which is like life...fisher himself agreeing..."Chess is life."
Is there such thing as a perfect game
of chess, some way to play
regardless of color of pieces, or name,
or ranking, or is there a way
to move that cannot lead to shame
but only victory?
Is there some strategy, some bit of advice,
that cannot fail a player if followed to
the letter, regardless if black or white
pieces await commands from you,
or is it that chess cannot be mastered
and all it comes down to each game
is stalemate, delight, or stanky disaster
for two people who aren't the same?
Should you counter this move with that
the way a dog's expected to chase a cat?
I wonder as I wander through the board
if chess is a game of thinking, or feeling,
guessing it's both, but searching for
the trick, if there is one, to winning,
since practicing for decades hasn't made
me unbeatable, or maybe my brain is frayed
and I don't have the intelligence to
think my way through
the quagmire, for I am vanquished more
than I remain the victor,
always getting better
for what that's worth forever,
and though I don't expect to be the best
nor reach untamable status
I do plan to keep on trying to
no matter what my opponents do
to me as I search on and on
for a guru, a revelation spawned,
whatever it takes to find a way
to crush every one I ever play!
Maybe someday...since hope's here to stay.