No matter the chess.com stats, I feel the power of black over white.
The power of white over black as seen on chess.com
Sort:
Most Recent
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic
No. The less skill the players have, the less likely it is that it will matter who goes first. At the grandmaster level, I think the ratio is something like 2 to 1 in white's favor. That's win-loss ratio, not counting draws. That's the accurate portrayal of the strength of white over black, since that removes the variable of downright lousy play. When you're dealing with players rated below 1500 in chess.com rating, I'd guess the ratio is probably around 50-50.
--Fromper
I'm gonna be honest, I think some chess players have a psychological issue, where they feel as black they must defend and equalize/draw things against high level competition. From a competitive aspect, this challenges their opponent to come up with some novelty or interesting complication to break through to get a win, so maybe they get some easy wins from overly aggressive mistakes. Not everybody is thinking about ways to complicate or win from the black-side. Maybe it's a consequence of getting whooped a few too many times in a truly complicated tussle.
I think that win/loss rate reflects that attitude at least partially. If almost nobody was willing to accept any easy or known draws as black, we would have a different distribution perhaps.
There is a reason why the Sicilian is so popular…. It gives Black a real fight.