The problem of Children on Chess.com - Chess Forums - Page 6

GZPP_100

Jun 20, 2023

0

#101

You gotta hate the people who can't even bother to use google to check their spelling. Lenient lolololololololololololololooo

Qinshu111_the_chess_panda

Jun 21, 2023

0

#102

navinashok wrote:

Soniasthetics wrote:

navinashok wrote:

Soniasthetics wrote:

navinashok wrote:

thats no excuse for them stalling, time is there when you need it. if im ridiculous, then you should probably go to a different forum.

did I give an excuse?

I said them being kids isnt the problem. Grown adults do this as well.

Did you bother to even read what I wrote? You are putting yourself in the worst possible position to be stalled against. you literally queued up a 30 minute game, and used 7 minutes. You're a ridiculous person.

And omg you just said you had to wait for 3 minutes. Wow, we're all so sad you lost 3 minutes of your life. 3 MINUTES. WHO CARES

what else did i have to read?

the fact that this has nothing to do with kids so your entire post is redundant anyway.
If you bothered to check the forums before posting you would of found thousands of posts like yours crying about people stalling.

Think about it, what did posting this do? nothing, you accomplished nothing. theres already rules in place for stallers, so you posting about someone stalling doesn't do anything besides show your immaturity.

And what makes it worse because you shared your game, now you're being ridiculed for hopping into a 30 minute game and only using 7 minutes. Its a reasonable ridicule, because you're complaining about waiting, but you jumped into a game that you have to wait for very long periods ANYWAY under normal circumstances.

Thats why no one has sympathy for you in the replies. Get a grip

using 7 minutes has nothing to do with what i said. The whole point of this post is for me to get chess.com to get a higher punishment for stalling, and if you cant see that, that's a YOU problem, not a 87 paragraph complaint problem. Anyway, maybe my time is more valuable than yours, I do a bit of things, you may, or may not, I will never know. But what I can say is that you have to respect time, I never stated that he stalled for 3 minutes and resigned, at the time i took this picture, he was stalling. And he "waited" for another 20 minutes, why are you just being a hater, like what did i do to you. Immature? alright idc thats a very lame argument if that's what you were trying to say...? Just because it's a long time control GIVES NO EXCUSE FOR STALLING. Just because it's a higher vulnerability to stalling, doesnt mean that I shouldn't play it, no i dont bother to check old forums far past reviving. Chess.com is comparatively lineant (however you spell that) to stalling. No hate to anyone.

I agree tbh

PedroG1464

Jun 21, 2023

0

#103

liev_frieordie wrote:

navinashok wrote:

Soniasthetics wrote:

navinashok wrote:

Soniasthetics wrote:

navinashok wrote:

thats no excuse for them stalling, time is there when you need it. if im ridiculous, then you should probably go to a different forum.

did I give an excuse?

I said them being kids isnt the problem. Grown adults do this as well.

Did you bother to even read what I wrote? You are putting yourself in the worst possible position to be stalled against. you literally queued up a 30 minute game, and used 7 minutes. You're a ridiculous person.

And omg you just said you had to wait for 3 minutes. Wow, we're all so sad you lost 3 minutes of your life. 3 MINUTES. WHO CARES

disfouiytfujghjkloiug uohjbnjiyu uig ilhuoj

sduiyfuih udshfhi sdifhisd iouf isdhiufahdaiushfudasuihfiuo hsaduif

asdjf hiaseuif hiuawehifohiuwehfiu hdsf idsuoh ifu haweiuh fuiaesuif hiasehfiusdahf asd

f sadipjh fidsahifuhwuiaehfi uhaseiuf wheufhauwe hfusdhuafh sadiuhfui sdhiuf hsdiuh fusduf hasdiuh fudais hfuhadsuif hsodahf uisdhiofdsiuhf iuasdhfu hwe9uh fs9dhf9wehsfd9uhawe9ushfd9pauwhe9sdfuhifhisdi fhiwehfiuwehfuihweiufh iuwehfiuwequf hoeqwhof euif agree uhuibunufegerre idjifsd

fh oeasihfoihdsofh sdoahfoihaesofhdsiolkjfoisadjfpo iwaejfpoikhfpaoidkhsfpoilakdsjpofilkjasdoi;fkjsdajfgewiofhuew foweqffd f oi3whof ewuhf uiwehfh4uwfh wehidsajkhfs jdjfoijweipfiojsdjhfliweahufh oeasihfoihdsofh sdoahfoihaesofhdsiolkjfoisadjfpo eqf

wque hiuofh9weqhu fhweqf we!!11!2

Chess.com is comparatively lineant (however you spell that) to stalling.

You gotta hate the people who can't even bother to use google to check their spelling. Lenient

Why do you hate lazy people? We didn’t even do anything.

Qinshu111_the_chess_panda

Jun 21, 2023

0

#104

epicdraw wrote:

Xbox is more fun

I like chess but Xbox is pretty fun

Jeffrey-SB

Jun 21, 2023

0

#105

They should have you sign up with your age as well and then those under a certain age should not have access to the chat function

Temporary_Closed-backsoon

Jun 21, 2023

0

#106

It's easy to lie about age though

Temporary_Closed-backsoon

Jun 21, 2023

0

#107

Lorax wrote: IanShawDulin wrote:

Are there any parental controls on this site? There should be. Like allowing them to play without communicating with strangers? If I had children, I wouldn't want them chatting with anyone, at least until they reach a certain age. Anyway, I though that was gonna be what this thread was about, lol.

I would also agree

True. I think the parents of a lot of kids on here aren't even aware of the chatting function, they think it's just a chess playing site and don't look into it ig

navinashok

Jun 21, 2023

0

#108

Kit_Raccoon wrote:

It's easy to lie about age though

discord **** groups that are run by middle schoolers.

sndeww

Jun 21, 2023

0

#109

IanShawDulin wrote:

Are there any parental controls on this site? There should be. Like allowing them to play without communicating with strangers? If I had children, I wouldn't want them chatting with anyone, at least until they reach a certain age. Anyway, I though that was gonna be what this thread was about, lol.

Yes.

There are.

Ok, answered both questions.

IsraeliGal

Jun 21, 2023

0

#110

navinashok wrote:

Soniasthetics wrote:

navinashok wrote:

Soniasthetics wrote:

navinashok wrote:

thats no excuse for them stalling, time is there when you need it. if im ridiculous, then you should probably go to a different forum.

did I give an excuse?

I said them being kids isnt the problem. Grown adults do this as well.

Did you bother to even read what I wrote? You are putting yourself in the worst possible position to be stalled against. you literally queued up a 30 minute game, and used 7 minutes. You're a ridiculous person.

And omg you just said you had to wait for 3 minutes. Wow, we're all so sad you lost 3 minutes of your life. 3 MINUTES. WHO CARES

what else did i have to read?

the fact that this has nothing to do with kids so your entire post is redundant anyway.
If you bothered to check the forums before posting you would of found thousands of posts like yours crying about people stalling.

Think about it, what did posting this do? nothing, you accomplished nothing. theres already rules in place for stallers, so you posting about someone stalling doesn't do anything besides show your immaturity.

And what makes it worse because you shared your game, now you're being ridiculed for hopping into a 30 minute game and only using 7 minutes. Its a reasonable ridicule, because you're complaining about waiting, but you jumped into a game that you have to wait for very long periods ANYWAY under normal circumstances.

Thats why no one has sympathy for you in the replies. Get a grip

using 7 minutes has nothing to do with what i said. The whole point of this post is for me to get chess.com to get a higher punishment for stalling, and if you cant see that, that's a YOU problem, not a 87 paragraph complaint problem. Anyway, maybe my time is more valuable than yours, I do a bit of things, you may, or may not, I will never know. But what I can say is that you have to respect time, I never stated that he stalled for 3 minutes and resigned, at the time i took this picture, he was stalling. And he "waited" for another 20 minutes, why are you just being a hater, like what did i do to you. Immature? alright idc thats a very lame argument if that's what you were trying to say...? Just because it's a long time control GIVES NO EXCUSE FOR STALLING. Just because it's a higher vulnerability to stalling, doesnt mean that I shouldn't play it, no i dont bother to check old forums far past reviving. Chess.com is comparatively lineant (however you spell that) to stalling. No hate to anyone.

listen the bottom line is rules already exist for stallers and they do get punished for it, so you saying you made this post to get staff to punish stallers is pointless. There is already mechanisms in place to both report stallers straight after a match is over, as well as the system itself dealing with them mid game.

And secondly no matter how much you go on about your time being valuable, there are people who will still stall, no matter how many reports you make, no matter how many POSTS you make, and no matter how many times you get pissed off. people will stall, its part of playing online chess.

That's why i said your post is redundant, and if anything you're just getting ridiculed because everyone on this site already knows these things and knows how many posts like this are made on a regular basis.

navinashok

Jun 21, 2023

0

#111