The proof Hans was not cheating is his Game against Aronian
Sort:
He did not cheat here but against Magnus, highly probable.
The way he plays the opening definitely isn't a good way to judge whether he was cheating or not
Oct 3, 2022
0
#5
While you may be correct that he didn't cheat in this match, but this isn't evidence of not cheating in this match.
Not cheating in one match doesn't mean Hans didn't cheat in others. Hans should not have to cheat to beat a 2200. He might to beat Magnus. In any case, my personal theory is that Magnus "threw" the Hans match, because Magnus was trying to "decode" the cheating system that he suspected Hans of using.
Oct 3, 2022
0
#9
I don't think your post displayed a low IQ Morning person.
It hints at one slightly perhaps.
The question is whether Hans cheated in Sinquefield cup against magnus?
If he didn’t then magnus created this hype to maybe … it’s in the interest of his deal with chess.com.
If he didn’t then magnus created this hype to maybe … it’s in the interest of his deal with chess.com.
Cheating existed before the sinquefield cup, magnus just woke up? This has nothing to do with Hans nor cheating. It has to do with business.
He plays stranges moves in the opening, the engine does not recommend it , so he is not cheating
After that, Aronian blunders twice and Hans punish him as a 2800 grande master