The real players on this game are bots

Sort:
Avatar of belg_veefomit
delcai007 написал:

You studied English in college and forgot that "bye" and "buy" have two different meanings?

Sorry, I should have been more attentive when typing the previous message))) And now for something completly the same. So, why aren't you sure that Chess.com has lots of reasons to give some weak players as am I, to engage me more during the successful games against bots?

Avatar of belg_veefomit
delcai007 написал:
belg_veefomit wrote:
delcai007 написал:
 

So, why aren't you sure that Chess.com has lots of reasons to give some weak players as am I, to engage me more during the successful games against bots?

It just isn't necessary, besides being completey unethical and wacky.

Well, if you have some time, please, look at this match that I won a couple of minutes ago. During the game I've honestly tried to play as bad as it is possible. Want to notice, that I'm not sad and I'm not accuusing nowone, but it is not possible to belive that my opponent was a real person https://www.chess.com/game/140849675334

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
belg_veefomit wrote:

Well, if you have some time, please, look at this match that I won a couple of minutes ago. During the game I've honestly tried to play as bad as it is possible. Want to notice, that I'm not sad and I'm not accuusing nowone, but it is not possible to belive that my opponent was a real person https://www.chess.com/game/140849675334

Looks exactly like two lower rated players.

Avatar of TheCobraisaready
delcai007 wrote:
TheCobraisaready wrote:

Why would a site that bans one hundred thousand accounts monthly, yes 100, 000. Need bots makes no sense, there is more than enough human players without the need for bots, unless some bots are put into the human pool of players to learn and get better possibly

Also senseless (completely unnecessary) would be for bots to secretly play humans for training purposes. LOL. This whole thread is psycho-level paranoid nonsense.

Look into it before you mouth off and call people paranoid, there is indeed bots on here playing chess without a doubt, it's actually how they caught someone cheating once they paired her against a bot which she beat and this was used to ban her, look it up before mouthing off

Avatar of TheCobraisaready
delcai007 wrote:
TheCobraisaready wrote:
delcai007 wrote:
TheCobraisaready wrote:

Why would a site that bans one hundred thousand accounts monthly, yes 100, 000. Need bots makes no sense, there is more than enough human players without the need for bots, unless some bots are put into the human pool of players to learn and get better possibly

Also senseless (completely unnecessary) would be for bots to secretly play humans for training purposes. LOL. This whole thread is psycho-level paranoid nonsense.

Look into it before you mouth off and call people paranoid, there is indeed bots on here playing chess without a doubt, it's actually how they caught someone cheating once they paired her against a bot which she beat and this was used to ban her, look it up before mouthing off

I don't need to look into it any further, doofus... I don't investigate ridicuolous ideas. And, sorry if it offends your delicate sensibilities but it is nothing but  paranoid nonsense to suggest that bots play here to boost the ratings of weak players (LOL) or for training purposes. I never said bots never played here at all or that there might not sometimes be a use for that. Take the time to read next time before you mouth off. Again, this thread should never have been resurrected. It's a garbage idea and deserves no attention that isn't negative, from a mod, I would hope, to finally shut it down.

Bro you can't even spell ridiculous and you're calling me a doofus, do some research then come back and tell me there's no bots in the player pools, your opinion counts for nothing otherwise, especially from a freckin 500 blitz player

Avatar of MaetsNori
TheCobraisaready wrote:

... it's actually how they caught someone cheating once they paired her against a bot which she beat and this was used to ban her, look it up ...

I'm curious if this is true, or just a fabricated rumor.

Who is "they"? Why did this happen only "once"? And who is "her"? ... Would like to see some actual info ...

Avatar of TheCobraisaready
MaetsNori wrote:
TheCobraisaready wrote:

... it's actually how they caught someone cheating once they paired her against a bot which she beat and this was used to ban her, look it up ...

I'm curious if this is true, or just a fabricated rumor.

Who is "they"? Why did this happen only "once"? And who is "her"? ... Would like to see some actual info ...

They- the shadow government lol obviously chess. Com I mean Jeezo that's quite self explanatory if we're talking about bots on here and I say "THEY" caught her cheating surely you can use your brain to determine THEY meant chess. Com no? Google it she was Greek should be easy to find

Avatar of MaetsNori

I mean "who" as in, was this an unusual case where an order came directly from Erik or Danny (a one-time rare occurance) or are we suggesting that this is regular protocol that the cheat detection staff do on the daily?

I have searched in Google for "greek player banned from chess.com cheating" but have not been able to find anything. At this point I'm thinking it's just a fictional rumor - but perhaps I'm not searching hard enough ...

In any case, most people who claim "bots!" are just jumping to conclusions, and confusing the issue. Sometimes we do face cheaters who are using engines - but those aren't the same as suggesting that chess.com hides bots in the player pool. Completely different scenarios.

Avatar of TheCobraisaready
MaetsNori wrote:

I mean "who" as in, was this an unusual case where an order came directly from Erik or Danny (a one-time rare occurance) or are we suggesting that this is regular protocol that the cheat detection staff do on the daily?

I have searched in Google for "greek player banned from chess.com cheating" but have not been able to find anything. At this point I'm thinking it's just a fictional rumor - but perhaps I'm not searching hard enough ...

In any case, most people who claim "bots!" are just jumping to conclusions, and confusing the issue. Sometimes we do face cheaters who are using engines - but those aren't the same as suggesting that chess.com hides bots in the player pool. Completely different scenarios.

Call me paranoid but looks like the details have been scrubbed clean forensically from the Internet, I may be compromised now and "they" will be triangulating my location as we speak, stay safe brother

Avatar of badger_song

The OP has played about 500 games over a period of just less than 8.5 years; that amounts to less than one game per week played. I doubt the OP, Xdzi0trz, has been taking accurate notes.

Avatar of MaetsNori
TheCobraisaready wrote:

Call me paranoid but looks like the details have been scrubbed clean forensically from the Internet, I may be compromised now and "they" will be triangulating my location as we speak, stay safe brother

Maybe it was something you heard? In a YouTube video, perhaps? I could see GothamChess talking about something like this, for example.

Avatar of MaetsNori

Try not to get sucked into internet arguments. In the end, everybody ends up feeling angry and looking foolish.

Avatar of HangingPiecesChomper

Nothing wrong with internet arguments when you know you're right.