The real players on this game are bots

more like bots put in live player pool to inflate their numbers to be much bigger than it seems to be.

I beg your pardon, but I studied English language at shool and university, not an american version of it.

More BS. Are you using Groc AI?

This was your first paragraph, clearly not written by anyone who studied English in college. Even the spelling is bad enough to be laughable. It's no shame to not be fluent in English. Just don't be deceitful about it. Again, no one needs you to sound polished. Just be yourself.

"You catched them, bro. Nontheless, I like that Chess.com has thousands of bots at the place of real players. This is a uniqe and only way for me to gain some points) But I defenetly will never bye a subscription"

You studied English in college and forgot that "bye" and "buy" have two different meanings?

I studied English on Youtube

I think the OP does not care since May, 16

Yeah, this thread should never have been resurrected.

It's tiresome. Almost always, it's really just about someone's self-esteem being tied to their rating, thus a need to cast blame. I don't have that problem, thank goodness

Sorry, I should have been more attentive when typing the previous message))) And now for something completly the same. So, why aren't you sure that Chess.com has lots of reasons to give some weak players as am I, to engage me more during the successful games against bots?

It's a lot more than inattention. Denying it only makes you look more deceitful. No one who studied English in college could write this:

"You catched them, bro. Nontheless, I like that Chess.com has thousands of bots at the place of real players. This is a uniqe and only way for me to gain some points) But I defenetly will never bye a subscription"

It just isn't necessary, besides being completey unethical and wacky.

Well, if you have some time, please, look at this match that I won a couple of minutes ago. During the game I've honestly tried to play as bad as it is possible. Want to notice, that I'm not sad and I'm not accuusing nowone, but it is not possible to belive that my opponent was a real person https://www.chess.com/game/140849675334

Looks exactly like two lower rated players.

Look into it before you mouth off and call people paranoid, there is indeed bots on here playing chess without a doubt, it's actually how they caught someone cheating once they paired her against a bot which she beat and this was used to ban her, look it up before mouthing off

I don't need to look into it any further, doofus... I don't investigate ridicuolous ideas. And, sorry if it offends your delicate sensibilities but it is nothing but  paranoid nonsense to suggest that bots play here to boost the ratings of weak players (LOL) or for training purposes. I never said bots never played here at all or that there might not sometimes be a use for that. Take the time to read next time before you mouth off. Again, this thread should never have been resurrected. It's a garbage idea and deserves no attention that isn't negative, from a mod, I would hope, to finally shut it down.

Bro you can't even spell ridiculous and you're calling me a doofus, do some research then come back and tell me there's no bots in the player pools, your opinion counts for nothing otherwise, especially from a freckin 500 blitz player

I'm curious if this is true, or just a fabricated rumor.

Who is "they"? Why did this happen only "once"? And who is "her"? ... Would like to see some actual info ...

They- the shadow government lol obviously chess. Com I mean Jeezo that's quite self explanatory if we're talking about bots on here and I say "THEY" caught her cheating surely you can use your brain to determine THEY meant chess. Com no? Google it she was Greek should be easy to find

I mean "who" as in, was this an unusual case where an order came directly from Erik or Danny (a one-time rare occurance) or are we suggesting that this is regular protocol that the cheat detection staff do on the daily?

I have searched in Google for "greek player banned from chess.com cheating" but have not been able to find anything. At this point I'm thinking it's just a fictional rumor - but perhaps I'm not searching hard enough ...

In any case, most people who claim "bots!" are just jumping to conclusions, and confusing the issue. Sometimes we do face cheaters who are using engines - but those aren't the same as suggesting that chess.com hides bots in the player pool. Completely different scenarios.